Abstract:Background: The promise of real-world evidence and the learning health care system primarily depends on access to high-quality data. Despite widespread awareness of the prevalence and potential impacts of poor data quality (DQ), best practices for its assessment and improvement are unknown. Objective: This review aims to investigate how existing research studies define, assess, and improve the quality of structured real-world health care data. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies in the English language was implemented in the Embase and PubMed databases to select studies that specifically aimed to measure and improve the quality of structured real-world data within any clinical setting. The time frame for the analysis was from January 1945 to June 2023. We standardized DQ concepts according to the Data Management Association (DAMA) DQ framework to enable comparison between studies. After screening and filtering by 2 independent authors, we identified 39 relevant articles reporting DQ improvement initiatives. Results: The studies were characterized by considerable heterogeneity in settings and approaches to DQ assessment and improvement. Affiliated institutions were from 18 different countries and 18 different health domains. DQ assessment methods were largely manual and targeted completeness and 1 other DQ dimension. Use of DQ frameworks was limited to the Weiskopf and Weng (3/6, 50%) or Kahn harmonized model (3/6, 50%). Use of standardized methodologies to design and implement quality improvement was lacking, but mainly included plan-do-study-act (PDSA) or define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) cycles. Most studies reported DQ improvements using multiple interventions, which included either DQ reporting and personalized feedback (24/39, 61%), IT-related solutions (21/39, 54%), training (17/39, 44%), improvements in workflows (5/39, 13%), or data cleaning (3/39, 8%). Most studies reported improvements in DQ through a combination of these interventions. Statistical methods were used to determine significance of treatment effect (22/39, 56% times), but only 1 study implemented a randomized controlled study design. Variability in study designs, approaches to delivering interventions, and reporting DQ changes hindered a robust meta-analysis of treatment effects. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines in DQ improvement research to enable comparison and effective synthesis of lessons learned. Frameworks such as PDSA learning cycles and the DAMA DQ framework can facilitate this unmet need. In addition, DQ improvement studies can also benefit from prioritizing root cause analysis of DQ issues to ensure the most appropriate intervention is implemented, thereby ensuring long-term, sustainable improvement. Despite the rise in DQ improvement studies in the last decade, significant heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting remains a challenge. Adopting standardized frameworks for DQ assessment, analysis, and improvement can enhance the effectiveness, comparability, and generalizability of DQ improvement initiatives.

Defining and Improving Data Quality in Medical Registries: A Literature Review, Case Study, and Generic Framework

Data quality improvement in general practice

Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

Improving Data Quality in Clinical Research Informatics Tools

Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: A literature review

Visualising Data Models of Patient Registries and Clinical Studies - A Method for Quality Check of EDC Systems

Data Quality in Health Research: Integrative Literature Review

A Review of the State of the Art of Data Quality in Healthcare

Frameworks, Dimensions, Definitions of Aspects, and Assessment Methods for the Appraisal of Quality of Health Data for Secondary Use: Comprehensive Overview of Reviews

Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings

Exploring Data Quality Management within Clinical Trials

A novel framework for assessing metadata quality in epidemiological and public health research settings

Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R

An Automated Data Verification Approach for Improving Data Quality in a Clinical Registry.

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects

A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data

Towards the development of a comprehensive framework: Qualitative systematic survey of definitions of clinical research quality

Medical data quality assessment: On the development of an automated framework for medical data curation

Impact of Data Governance on Data Quality in Healthcare Institutions

Abstract TP98: Data Quality Review: Opportunities Through Transparency