Abstract:Researchers generally agree that physics experts use mathematics in a way that blends mathematical knowledge with physics intuition. However, the use of mathematics in physics education has traditionally tended to focus more on the computational aspect (manipulating mathematical operations to get numerical solutions) to the detriment of building conceptual understanding and physics intuition. Several solutions to this problem have been suggested; some authors have suggested building conceptual understanding before mathematics is introduced, while others have argued for the inseparability of the two, claiming instead that mathematics and conceptual physics need to be taught simultaneously. Although there is a body of work looking into how students employ mathematical reasoning when working with equations, the specifics of how physics experts use mathematics blended with physics intuition remain relatively underexplored. In this paper, we describe some components of this blending, by analyzing how physicists perform the rearrangement of a specific equation in cosmology. Our data consist of five consecutive forms of rearrangement of the equation, as observed in three separate higher education cosmology courses. This rearrangement was analyzed from a conceptual reasoning perspective using Sherin's framework of symbolic forms. Our analysis clearly demonstrates how the number of potential symbolic forms associated with each subsequent rearrangement of the equation decreases as we move from line to line. Drawing on this result, we suggest an underlying mechanism for how physicists reason with equations. This mechanism seems to consist of three components: narrowing down meaning potential, moving aspects between the background and the foreground and purposefully transforming the equation according to the discipline's questions of interest. In the discussion section we highlight the potential that our work has for generalizability and how being aware of the components of this underlying mechanism can potentially affect physics teachers' practice when using mathematics in the physics classroom.

A Conceptual Blend Analysis of Physics Quantitative Literacy Reasoning Inventory Items

The Physics Inventory of Quantitative Literacy: A tool for assessing mathematical reasoning in introductory physics

Using psychometric tools as a window into students' quantitative reasoning in introductory physics

Developing a reasoning inventory for measuring physics quantitative literacy

Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs

Blending physical knowledge with mathematical form in physics problem solving

Interview validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

Student facility with ratio and proportion: Mapping the reasoning space in introductory physics

Obstacles to Mathematization in Introductory Physics

Coupling Conceptual and Quantitative Problems to Develop Expertise in Introductory Physics Students

What are we assessing? An analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics

Quantitative critical thinking: Student activities using Bayesian updating

Towards a Generalized Assessment of Computational Thinking for Introductory Physics Students

Developing Mathematical Creativity with Physics Invention Tasks

Rearranging Equations to Develop Physics Reasoning

Development of Physics-Tier Tests (PysTT) to Measure Students' Conceptual Understanding and Creative Thinking Skills: A Qualitative Synthesis

A framework for characterizing covariational reasoning in physics

Assessing Scientific Practices in Physics Paper-based Assessments

Quantitative Reasoning in Environmental Science: Rasch Measurement to Support QR Assessment

Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses