Are 3D Image Guidance Systems Ready for Use? A Comparative Analysis of 3D Image Guidance Implementations in Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy

Piper Cannon,Shaan A Setia,Stacy Klein-Gardner,Nicholas Kavoussi,Robert J. Webster III,Duke Herrell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0059
2024-01-23
Journal of Endourology
Abstract:Introduction Three-dimensional image guided surgical systems (3D-IGS) for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy can potentially improve the efficiency and accuracy of intraoperative anatomical localization and tumor resection. This review seeks to analyze the current state of research regarding 3D-IGS. Further, we quantitatively analyze a subset of the included studies which evaluate a 3D-IGS system in-vivo and compare the results to a control group who are surgically treated with the current standard of care. Methods We have systematically reviewed the clinical literature pertaining to 3D-IGS deployed for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. For inclusion, studies must produce a patient-specific 3D anatomical model from 2D imaging. Data extracted from the studies include clinical results, registration (alignment of the 3D model to the surgical scene) method used, limitations and data types reported. A subset of studies was qualitatively analyzed via an inductive coding approach to identify major themes and subthemes across the studies. Results 25 studies were included in the review. 8 (32%) studies reported clinical results which point to 3D-IGS improving multiple surgical outcomes. Manual registration was the most utilized (48%). Soft tissue deformation was the most cited limitation among the included studies. Many studies reported qualitative statements regarding surgeon accuracy improvement, but no quantitative surgeon accuracy data were reported. During the qualitative analysis, six major themes emerged across the 9 applicable studies. They are as follows: 3D-IGS is necessary, 3D-IGS improved surgical outcomes, researcher/surgeon confidence in 3D-IGS system, enhanced surgeon ability/accuracy, anatomical explanation for qualitative assessment, and claims without data or reference to support. Conclusions Currently, clinical outcomes are the main source of quantitative data available to point to 3D-IGS's efficacy. However, the literature qualitatively suggests the benefit of accurate 3D-IGS for robotic partial nephrectomy.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?