Abstract:Background Double-checking the administration of medications has been standard practice in paediatric hospitals around the world for decades. While the practice is widespread, evidence of its effectiveness in reducing errors or harm is scarce. Objectives To measure the association between double-checking, and the occurrence and potential severity of medication administration errors (MAEs); check duration; and factors associated with double-checking adherence. Methods Direct observational study of 298 nurses, administering 5140 medication doses to 1523 patients, across nine wards, in a paediatric hospital. Independent observers recorded details of administrations and double-checking (independent; primed-one nurse shares information which may influence the checking nurse; incomplete; or none) in real time during weekdays and weekends between 07:00 and 22:00. Observational medication data were compared with patients' medical records by a reviewer (blinded to checking-status), to identify MAEs. MAEs were rated for potential severity. Observations included administrations where double-checking was mandated, or optional. Multivariable regression examined the association between double-checking, MAEs and potential severity; and factors associated with policy adherence. Results For 3563 administrations double-checking was mandated. Of these, 36 (1 center dot 0%) received independent double-checks, 3296 (92 center dot 5%) primed and 231 (6 center dot 5%) no/incomplete double-checks. For 1577 administrations double-checking was not mandatory, but in 26 center dot 3% (n=416) nurses chose to double-check. Where double-checking was mandated there was no significant association between double-checking and MAEs (OR 0 center dot 89 (0 center dot 65-1 center dot 21); p=0 center dot 44), or potential MAE severity (OR 0 center dot 86 (0 center dot 65-1 center dot 15); p=0 center dot 31). Where double-checking was not mandated, but performed, MAEs were less likely to occur (OR 0 center dot 71 (0 center dot 54-0 center dot 95); p=0 center dot 02) and had lower potential severity (OR 0 center dot 75 (0 center dot 57-0 center dot 99); p=0 center dot 04). Each double-check took an average of 6 center dot 4 min (107 hours/1000 administrations). Conclusions Compliance with mandated double-checking was very high, but rarely independent. Primed double-checking was highly prevalent but compared with single-checking conferred no benefit in terms of reduced errors or severity. Our findings raise questions about if, when and how double-checking policies deliver safety benefits and warrant the considerable resource investments required in modern clinical settings.

Evaluating Independent Double Checks in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Human Factors Engineering Approach

The Design and Clinical Application of a Multidisciplinary Round Electronic Checklist in ICU

Associations Between Double-Checking and Medication Administration Errors: a Direct Observational Study of Paediatric Inpatients

Effectiveness of Double Checking to Reduce Medication Administration Errors: a Systematic Review

Intelligent checklists improve checklist compliance in the intensive care unit: a prospective before-and-after mixed-method study

Intelligent dynamic clinical checklists improved checklist compliance in the intensive care unit

A combined intervention to reduce interruptions during medication preparation and double-checking: a pilot-study evaluating the impact of staff training and safety vests

Testing the implementation of an electronic process-of-care checklist for use during morning medical rounds in a tertiary intensive care unit: a prospective before-after study

Handoff checklists improve the reliability of patient handoffs in the operating room and postanesthesia care unit

Targeting zero medication administration errors in the pediatric intensive care unit: A Quality Improvement project

Medication Safety Gaps in English Pediatric Inpatient Units: An Exploration Using Work Domain Analysis

Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study

Usability Testing of Situation Awareness Clinical Decision Support in the ICU

Work System Assessment to Facilitate the Dissemination of a Quality Improvement Program for Optimizing Blood Culture Use: A Case Study Using a Human Factors Engineering Approach

Evaluating Patient Identification Practices During Intrahospital Transfers: A Human Factors Approach

Successfully transitioning an interruptive alert into a non-interruptive alert for central line dressing changes in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Development and implementation of autoverification standardization in the adult and pediatric emergency department

Lean Design of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patient Room for Efficient and Safe Care Delivery

Reducing NICU Unplanned Extubations From Tube Dislodgement

Prevent Acute Chest Syndrome checklist (PACScheck): A quality improvement initiative to reduce acute chest syndrome

Evaluation of an automated surveillance system using trigger alerts to prevent adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward