Abstract:During the last decade, the use of geophysical techniques has become popular in many geomorphological studies. However, the correct handling of geophysical instruments and the subsequent processing of the data they yield are difficult tasks. Furthermore, the description and interpretation of geomorphological settings to which they apply can significantly influence the data gathering and subsequent modelling procedure (e.g. achieving a maximum depth of 30 m requires a certain profile length and geophone spacing or a particular frequency of antenna). For more than three decades geophysical techniques have been successfully applied, for example, in permafrost studies. However, in many cases complex or more heterogeneous subsurface structures could not be adequately interpreted due to limited computer facilities and time consuming calculations. As a result of recent technical improvements, geophysical techniques have been applied to a wider spectrum of geomorphological and geological settings. This paper aims to present some examples of geomorphological studies that demonstrate the powerful integration of geophysical techniques and highlight some of the limitations of these techniques. A focus has been given to the three most frequently used techniques in geomorphology to date, namely ground-penetrating radar, seismic refraction and DC resistivity. Promising applications are reported for a broad range of landforms and environments, such as talus slopes, block fields, landslides, complex valley fill deposits, karst and loess covered landforms. A qualitative assessment highlights suitable landforms and environments. The techniques can help to answer yet unsolved questions in geomorphological research regarding for example sediment thickness and internal structures. However, based on case studies it can be shown that the use of a single geophysical technique or a single interpretation tool is not recommended for many geomorphological surface and subsurface conditions as this may lead to significant errors in interpretation. Because of changing physical properties of the subsurface material (e.g. sediment, water content) in many cases only a combination of two or sometimes even three geophysical methods gives sufficient insight to avoid serious misinterpretation. A “good practice guide” has been framed that provides recommendations to enable the successful application of three important geophysical methods in geomorphology and to help users avoid making serious mistakes.

Geophysical tomography in engineering geology: an overview

Application of Computerized Tomography on Geotechnical Engineering Study

Recent developments, challenges, and future research directions of tomographic characterization of fractured aquifers

Analysis Of Integrating Ert Data Of Different Array Types: Simulation Study And Observations On An Archaeological Site

Ct Technique And Its Applications In Engineering Geology

Application of percolation theory to microtomography of rocks

On tomography velocity uncertainty in relation with structural imaging

Application of resistivity tomography technique to detecting hidden danger in embankment

Introduction to tensorial resistivity probability tomography

Groundwater exploration using integrated geophysical techniques

Tomography of nonlinear materials via the monotonicity principle

On the method of surface-wave tomography and perspectives for its application in engineering seismic exploration

Two-Dimensional Joint Inversion of Seismic Velocity and Electrical Resistivity Using Seismic Travel Times and Full Channel Electrical Measurements Based on Alternating Cross-Gradient Structural Constraint

Solution of the Interpretation Tomography Problem in Geophysics under the Linear Integral Representation Method and Theories of Discrete Gravity and the Magnetic Potential

Geology differentiation: A new frontier in quantitative geophysical interpretation in mineral exploration

Lithological Tomography with the Correlated Pseudo-Marginal Method

Application of field geophysics in geomorphology: Advances and limitations exemplified by case studies

Adjoint-State Surface Wave Tomography for Azimuthally Anisotropic Media: Eikonal Equation-Based Methods and Incorporation of Surface Topography

Unraveling subsurface crustal dynamics: exploring electrical and seismic refraction methods from theories to existing and machine learning-based emerging prospects

Application of the Equipotential Line Tracing Method to Cross-Hole Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Towards a multi-physics multi-scale approach of deep geothermal exploration