Abstract:Objective Nearly half of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency programs in the United States lost access to local training in abortion care following the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Supreme Court decision. We aimed to determine whether OB/GYN residency candidates who desire abortion training apply to programs in states where abortion is restricted/banned. Study Design In 2023, we conducted an anonymous electronic survey of residency interviewees at three large academic OB/GYN programs about the importance of various program characteristics in their selection process. We chose to represent both very restrictive and protective environments for abortion care. We stratified respondents by importance of abortion training in applying to programs (essential or very important [high preference group] versus moderately, slightly, or not important [low preference group]). Results We analyzed 175 completed surveys (response rate 56%). Of 175 respondents, most (n=115, 66%) stated that access to abortion training was essential (33%) or very important (33%) when applying to programs. Both high preference group (82%) and low preference group respondents (98%) applied in states where abortion is banned or restricted. Respondents applied in banned/restricted states due to geography, concern about applying to too few programs, and expectation that the program would provide out-of-state training nonetheless. Conclusion The majority of survey respondents who reported that access to abortion training during residency is essential or very important applied to programs where abortion training is not locally available. Most of these applicants expected programs in restricted states to provide training regardless. Implications Residency programs should be aware of the importance of abortion training to applicants, as well as abortion training expectations, and work to develop opportunities and strengthen training networks in abortion care to meet candidates' needs and ensure adequate learning opportunities exist for all.

US states with abortion bans attract fewer applicants for residency positions, study finds

Importance of abortion training to United States Obstetrics and Gynecology residency applicants in 2023

How Dobbs May Influence the Geographic Distribution of Medical Trainees in the United States

US abortions have increased despite bans

Medical student perceptions of clinical abortion training opportunities across the United States

Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications After Abortion Access Changes

US states that ban abortion have had nearly 65 000 pregnancies from rape, data show

Abortion Education for Medical Students in an Era of Increased Abortion Restrictions

Banning abortion prevents us from providing safe care to all pregnant women

Applying global lessons to protect abortion access in the United States

Abortion Training in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors 5 Months After the Dobbs Decision

Family practice residents aren't getting enough training in reproductive health care

Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020

Are state abortion bans an occupational health hazard for obstetrician-gynaecologists? Findings from a multistate qualitative study

US Supreme Court hears arguments on whether states can regulate emergency abortions

Attorneys general in 25 US states ask for emergency abortions to be excluded from bans

The Impact of Changing Abortion Legislation on Emergency Medicine Residents in a State With Protected Abortion Rights

What role should maternal-fetal medicine physicians play in the era of abortion restriction?

The impact of abortion bans on short-term housing needs

Understanding abortion legality and trimester of abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, three abortion‐restrictive states

Longitudinal Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization on Abortion Service Delivery in Ohio, 2022‒2023