Abstract:Background: Most obstetric emergencies are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). The Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, eliminated constitutional protection of abortion rights, allowing states to swiftly enact laws that can greatly change reproductive medicine. In this post-Roe landscape, the ambiguity and uncertainty being imposed on clinicians regarding the legality of certain interventions may have catastrophic effects. To understand and plan for the changes that will come and attempt to mitigate adverse outcomes, the authors first assessed the current state of pregnancy-related complication care in the ED setting. This study utilized data obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to evaluate trends in pregnancy-related ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that could be impacted by restricted abortion access and trigger laws. The authors subsequently analyzed the legislative changes and translated the pertinent ones to dispel misunderstandings and provide a framework for appropriate medical practice. Methods: The retrospective study utilized data from the NHAMCS database from 2016 to 2020, encompassing an estimated total of 4,556,778 pregnancy-related ED visits. NHAMCS is a multi-stage probabilistic sample collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using an annual survey of EDs in the United States. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportions and 95% confidence intervals Furthermore, the supreme court decision was analyzed in addition to multiple state laws and legal texts. The findings were summarized and discussed. Results: The majority (79.4%) of all studied visits were for patients between the ages of 18-34 years, capturing those in peak reproductive years. This age group also comprised of the bulk (76.4%) of visits for pathologic pregnancies, including ectopic and molar pregnancies, and 79.8% of visits for a spontaneous miscarriage or threatened miscarriage in early pregnancy. Black patients accounted for 25.7%, white patients 70.1%. Regarding ethnicity, patients were separated into Hispanic and non-Hispanic, with Hispanic patients comprising 27% of all ED visits for included diagnoses between 2016 and 2020. Most visits for complications following an induced abortion occurred in the south (70.8%) and were nearly twice as likely to occur in non-metropolitan areas. Approximately 18% patients presenting with a pathologic pregnancy required admission to the hospital and approximately 50% of those visits for pathologic pregnancies and visits for bleeding in pregnancy had a procedure in the ED (49.8% and 49.5%). There were 111,264 estimated visits in which methotrexate was administered, amounting to approximately 1 in 7 visits for ectopic or molar pregnancy. In this data set, approximately 14,000 miscarriage and early bleeding patients received misoprostol. Conclusion: Pregnancy-related ED visits comprise of a significant proportion of emergency care. As it relates to many of the trends previously elucidated on, the true extent of the burden cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that contrary to popular belief, Dobbs v. Jackson does not prohibit termination of pregnancy in the setting of life-threatening conditions to the mother, including ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and others, but the resultant uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding the constitutional change is leading to an over-compliance of the law, necessarily obstructing reproductive health care. The authors recommend that physicians be mindful of the rapidly-evolving laws in their particular state, and to also practice in accordance with Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Patient safety must be prioritized.

Applying global lessons to protect abortion access in the United States

Current Development in the United States Case Law on Abortion and its Possible Impacts on the European Union and Continental Legal System

Banning abortion prevents us from providing safe care to all pregnant women

Abortion Education for Medical Students in an Era of Increased Abortion Restrictions

The right to artificial termination of pregnancy (abortion) in the practice of the US Supreme Court: a review of recent trends

Abortion as Essential Health Care and the Critical Role Your Practice Can Play in Protecting Abortion Access

US abortions have increased despite bans

Post- Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans

The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health

Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020

Brief of over 300 reproductive health researchers as Amici Curiae in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision

Importance of abortion training to United States Obstetrics and Gynecology residency applicants in 2023

Progress toward abortion access and quality care: Examples from across the globe

Medication and procedural abortion uptake during a period of increasing abortion hostility

What role should maternal-fetal medicine physicians play in the era of abortion restriction?

Telehealth enables safe medication abortion in shifting health and legal contexts

US Supreme Court hears arguments on whether states can regulate emergency abortions

A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America

The impact of provider restrictions on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Social Development and Abortion Policies in the United States: State-Wise Variations