Abstract:Classification systems can be an important tool for identifying and quantifying the importance of relationships, assessing spatial patterns in a standardized way, and forecasting alternative decision scenarios to characterize the potential benefits (e.g., ecosystem services) from ecosystem restoration that improve human health and well-being. We present a top-down approach that systematically leverages ecosystem services classification systems to identify potential services relevant for ecosystem restoration decisions. We demonstrate this approach using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Ecosystem Service Classification System Plus (NESCS Plus) to identify those ecosystem services that are relevant to restoration of tidal wetlands. We selected tidal wetland management documents from federal agencies, state agencies, wetland conservation organizations, and land stewards across three regions of the continental United States (northern Gulf of Mexico, Mid-Atlantic, and Pacific Northwest) to examine regional and organizational differences in identified potential benefits of tidal wetland restoration activities and the potential user groups who may benefit. We used an automated document analysis to quantify the frequencies at which different wetland types were mentioned in the management documents along with their associated beneficiary groups and the ecological end products (EEPs) those beneficiaries care about, as defined by NESCS Plus. Results showed that a top combination across all three regions, all four organizations, and all four tidal wetland types was the EEP naturalness paired with the beneficiary people who care (existence). Overall, the Mid-Atlantic region and the land steward organizations mentioned ecosystem services more than the others, and EEPs were mentioned in combination with tidal wetlands as a high-level, more general category than the other more specific tidal wetland types. Certain regional and organizations differences were statistically significant. Those results may be useful in identifying ecosystem services-related goals for tidal wetland restoration. This approach for identifying and comparing ecosystem service priorities is broadly transferrable to other ecosystems or decision-making contexts.

The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept

The Dilemma of Scale: competing imperatives for global restoration

Organizational capacity and ecological restoration

Restoration Ecology and the Path to Sustainability

The social–ecological ladder of restoration ambition

How Social Considerations Improve the Equity and Effectiveness of Ecosystem Restoration

Grasp the Prior Ecosystem Services in Multi-Objective Ecological Restoration

Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead

Ecosystem service assessment under ecological restoration programs: A systematic review of studies from China

Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature

Ecological restoration success from community and agency perspectives: exploring the differences

Spatiotemporal Relationship between Ecological Restoration Space and Ecosystem Services in the Yellow River Basin, China

Perspectives on Challenges and Opportunities at the Restoration‐Policy Interface in the U.S.A.

How Would Ecological Restoration Affect Multiple Ecosystem Service Supplies and Tradeoffs? A Study of Mine Tailings Restoration in China

Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China

Harnessing ecological theory to enhance ecosystem restoration

Political science and ecological restoration

The Ecological Benefits of Positive Public Perception on Public Access Ecological Restorations

The impact of large-scale ecological restoration projects on trade-offs/synergies and clusters of ecosystem services

What about cultural ecosystems? Opportunities for cultural considerations in the “International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration”

Identifying priority ecosystem services in tidal wetland restoration