Abstract:Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print. Sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design is becoming increasingly used in the field of precision medicine. This design allows comparisons of sequences of adaptive interventions tailored to the individual patient. Superiority testing is usually the initial goal in order to determine which embedded adaptive intervention yields the best primary outcome on average. When direct superiority is not evident, yet an adaptive intervention poses other benefits, then non-inferiority testing is warranted. Non-inferiority testing in the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial setup is rather new and involves the specification of non-inferiority margin and other important assumptions that are often unverifiable internally. These challenges are not specific to sequential multiple assignment randomized trial and apply to two-arm non-inferiority trials that do not include a standard-of-care (or placebo) arm. To address some of these challenges, three-arm non-inferiority trials that include the standard-of-care arm are proposed. However, methods developed so far for three-arm non-inferiority trials are not sequential multiple assignment randomized trial-specific. This is because apart from embedded adaptive interventions, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial typically does not include a third standard-of-care arm. In this article, we consider a three-arm sequential multiple assignment randomized trial from an National Institutes of Health-funded study of symptom management strategies among people undergoing cancer treatment. Motivated by that example, we propose a novel data analytic method for non-inferiority testing in the framework of three-arm sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for the first time. Sample size and power considerations are discussed through extensive simulation studies to elucidate our method.

A combined superiority and non-inferiority procedure for comparing predictive values of two diagnostic tests

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Statistical Methods for Comparing Predictive Values in Medical Diagnosis

A Direct Approach to Simultaneous Tests of Superiority and Noninferiority with Multiple Endpoints

Medical diagnostic accuracy measures: an innovative approach based on the area under predictive values curves

A multiple testing framework for diagnostic accuracy studies with co-primary endpoints

Measures of Performance and Clinical Superiority Thresholds for 'Test-and-treat' Predictive Biomarkers

Combined Fine-Needle Aspiration and Selective Intraoperative Frozen Section to Optimize Prediction of Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Retrospective Cohort Study of More Than 3000 Patients

Analysis of two Binomial Proportions in Non-inferiority Confirmatory Trials

Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs

Statistical inference for diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple comparisons

A Comparative Review of Methods for Comparing Means Using Partially Paired Data

Test for Incremental Value of New Biomarkers Based on OR Rules

A framework for testing non-inferiority in a three-arm, sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial

Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests

A Non-Parametric Method for the Comparison of Partial Areas under ROC Curves and Its Application to Large Health Care Data Sets.

Efficient and powerful equivalency test on combined mean and variance with application to diagnostic device comparison studies

Testing for improvement in prediction model performance

A comparison of Bayesian and score methods for interval estimates of positive/negative likelihood ratios in support of diagnostic device performance evaluation

Improved Confidence Regions in Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Simultaneous inference for partial areas under receiver operating curves -- with a view towards efficiency