Trap or Opportunity: Impact of the Fishing Ban Compensation Policy on the Income of Returning Fishermen in China

Ji Feng,Yali Wen,Huiyuan Zhang,Yilei Hou,Zhe Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114401
IF: 3.9
2024-05-24
Sustainability
Abstract:The conflict between biodiversity conservation and economic development is intense in developing countries. With the decline in biodiversity, the Chinese government imposed a 10-year fishing ban in the priority waters of the Yangtze River Basin, which resulted in many fishermen losing their livelihood. However, a compensation policy was subsequently introduced. To investigate the impact of the ban, we conducted a two-year study using balanced panel data and the PSM-DID model for 365 households in the Poyang Lake area and introduced fixed effects to discuss the impact of the Yangtze River fishing ban compensation policy on the income of returning fishermen and their choices for alternative income. We also explored the interactive effects of fishing ban compensation and other biodiversity conservation policies on their income. The results showed that the fishing ban negatively impacted the agricultural income of households but not the total household income, and the compensation somewhat subsidized the fishermen's loss of income. Moreover, this was an opportunity for farmers to adjust their livelihood strategies. These findings improve our understanding of the impact of this fishing ban and compensation policy on the household incomes of returning fishermen and their adaptive strategies for alternative income.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Issues Addressed by the Paper This paper primarily explores the impact of the fishing ban policy and its compensation measures on the income of fishermen in the Yangtze River Basin in China. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Evaluate the impact of the fishing ban policy**: By studying the specific impact of the fishing ban policy on the income of fishermen in the Poyang Lake area, the paper analyzes whether the fishing ban policy has led to a decline in agricultural income and whether this decline has had a negative impact on total household income. 2. **Effectiveness of compensation measures**: The paper explores to what extent the fishing ban compensation policy has alleviated the income loss caused by the fishing ban for fishermen and analyzes whether these compensation measures have helped fishermen adjust their livelihood strategies. 3. **Interaction effects of multiple policies**: The study examines the interaction between the fishing ban compensation policy and other biodiversity conservation policies to understand how these policies collectively affect the income levels of fishermen. The paper conducts a two-year study on 365 households in the Poyang Lake area, using balanced panel data and the PSM-DID model to evaluate the actual effects of the fishing ban compensation policy. The study finds that although the fishing ban policy has had a negative impact on agricultural income, it has not significantly reduced total household income, and the compensation measures have to some extent offset the income loss of fishermen. Additionally, the fishing ban policy has provided fishermen with opportunities to adjust their livelihood strategies. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact of fishing ban and compensation policies on the income of fishermen's households and their adaptive strategies.