Abstract:Neural architecture search (NAS) has achieved breakthrough success in a great number of applications in the past few years. It could be time to take a step back and analyze the good and bad aspects in the field of NAS. A variety of algorithms search architectures under different search space. These searched architectures are trained using different setups, e.g., hyper-parameters, data augmentation, regularization. This raises a comparability problem when comparing the performance of various NAS algorithms. NAS-Bench-101 has shown success to alleviate this problem. In this work, we propose an extension to NAS-Bench-101: NAS-Bench201 with a different search space, results on multiple datasets, and more diagnostic information. NAS-Bench-201 has a fixed search space and provides a unified benchmark for almost any up-to-date NAS algorithms. The design of our search space is inspired from the one used in the most popular cell-based searching algorithms, where a cell is represented as a directed acyclic graph. Each edge here is associated with an operation selected from a predefined operation set. For it to be applicable for all NAS algorithms, the search space defined in NAS-Bench-201 includes all possible architectures generated by 4 nodes and 5 associated operation options, which results in 15,625 neural cell candidates in total. The training log using the same setup and the performance for each architecture candidate are provided for three datasets. This allows researchers to avoid unnecessary repetitive training for selected architecture and focus solely on the search algorithm itself. The training time saved for every architecture also largely improves the efficiency of most NAS algorithms and brings a more computational cost friendly NAS community for a broader range of researchers. We provide additional diagnostic information such as fine-grained loss and accuracy, which can give inspirations to new designs of NAS algorithms. In further support of the proposed NAS-Bench201, we have analyzed it from many aspects and benchmarked 10 recent NAS algorithms, which verify its applicability.

Progressive Neural Index Search for Database System

Dynamic Index Construction with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Generalized Global Ranking-Aware Neural Architecture Ranker for Efficient Image Classifier Search

A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrieval

NEIST: A Neural-Enhanced Index for Spatio-Temporal Queries

AutoIndex: an Incremental Index Management System for Dynamic Workloads

Using of Neuro-Indexes

Spatial-Temporal Search for Spiking Neural Networks

Index Selection for NoSQL Database with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Latency-aware Neural Architecture Performance Predictor with Query-to-Tier Technique

SEINE: SEgment-based Indexing for NEural information retrieval

Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrieval

Neural Architecture Search with Progressive Evaluation and Sub-Population Preservation

Predictive Indexing

NeurDB: On the Design and Implementation of an AI-powered Autonomous Database

A Scalable Learned Index Scheme in Storage Systems

Efficient spiking neural network design via neural architecture search

Multi-scale Evolutionary Neural Architecture Search for Deep Spiking Neural Networks

Progressive Feature Interaction Search for Deep Sparse Network.

A Technical View on Neural Architecture Search

Producible neural architecture search