Abstract:Academic abstract: Advantaged group allies have multiple motives for supporting equality, raising questions about their sincerity. We draw upon the covariation model of attributions to explain how disadvantaged group members make attributions about whether advantaged group "allies" are sincerely motivated to empower the disadvantaged group. We propose an Attribution-Identity Model of Sincerity (AIMS) which posits that disadvantaged group members view advantaged group members as sincere allies when they support equality in the presence of inhibitory causes and in the absence of facilitative causes, exceed expectations for the advantaged group, and provide support across time and contexts. Furthermore, those who identify strongly with their disadvantaged group and perceive intergroup inequality as illegitimate are most motivated to ascertain the sincerity of advantaged group members' allyship. AIMS suggests how members of disadvantaged groups seek to maximize benefits and minimize risks of advantaged group members' allyship. Public abstract: Advantaged group members (e.g., men, White Americans) can act as allies for disadvantaged groups (e.g., women, Americans belonging to minoritized racial groups), but members of disadvantaged groups sometimes have reason to question whether their motives are sincere. We argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when they support equality when they do not stand to benefit from it and even when they stand to lose. We also argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when their support for equality goes beyond expectations for their advantaged group, consistently over time, and is not limited to particular situations, forms, or contexts. Members of disadvantaged groups like sincere allies, want to work with them, and feel safe around them. Sincere allies also serve as moral exemplars to other members of advantaged groups.

Modesty's inoffensive self-presentation

Politeness as a Linguistic Device in Response to the Speech Act of Modesty

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Motivational and emotional aspects of the self

Ludic Piety and the Limits of Modesty

Explaining East-West Differences in the Likelihood of Making Favorable Self-Evaluations: the Role of Evaluation Apprehension and Directness of Expression

Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.

Validation of the Japanese Version of the Modest Behavior Scale for Adults and Age and Gender Differences

Honesty starts from within: conceptualization and multimethod measurement of self-honesty as a core value

The Role of Self-Construal in Predicting Self-Presentational Motives for Online Social Network Use in the Uk and Japan

Fairness, Hierarchy, and Moral Rationalization, or What's Wrong With Paradise Lost?

Similar or Different Effects? Quantifying the Effects of Humility and Modesty on Job Performance

The Interactional Organization of Self-praise

Narcissism: its function in modulating self-conscious emotions

Self-Consciousness as a Construction All the Way Down

Intellectual Humility and Owning One’s Limitations

Intellectual Servility and Timidity

Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding.

Timidity as a Response Style to Psychological Questionnaires

Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly