Abstract:STUDY QUESTION:Can whole genome sequencing (WGS) offer a relatively cost-effective approach for embryonic genome-wide haplotyping and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), aneuploidy (PGT-A) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)?SUMMARY ANSWER:Reliable genome-wide haplotyping, PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR could be performed by WGS with 10× depth of parental and 4× depth of embryonic sequencing data.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY:Reduced representation genome sequencing with a genome-wide next-generation sequencing haplarithmisis-based solution has been verified as a generic approach for automated haplotyping and comprehensive PGT. Several low-depth massively parallel sequencing (MPS)-based methods for haplotyping and comprehensive PGT have been developed. However, an additional family member, such as a sibling, or a proband, is required for PGT-M haplotyping using low-depth MPS methods.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION:In this study, 10 families that had undergone traditional IVF-PGT and 53 embryos, including 13 embryos from two PGT-SR families and 40 embryos from eight PGT-M families, were included to evaluate a WGS-based method. There were 24 blastomeres and 29 blastocysts in total. All embryos were used for PGT-A. Karyomapping validated the WGS results. Clinical outcomes of the 10 families were evaluated.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS:A blastomere or a few trophectoderm cells from the blastocyst were biopsied, and multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was performed. MDA DNA and bulk DNA of family members were used for library construction. Libraries were sequenced, and data analysis, including haplotype inheritance deduction for PGT-M and PGT-SR and read-count analysis for PGT-A, was performed using an in-house pipeline. Haplotyping with a proband and parent-only haplotyping without additional family members were performed to assess the WGS methodology. Concordance analysis between the WGS results and traditional PGT methods was performed.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE:For the 40 PGT-M and 53 PGT-A embryos, 100% concordance between the WGS and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array results was observed, regardless of whether additional family members or a proband was included for PGT-M haplotyping. For the 13 embryos from the two PGT-SR families, the embryonic balanced translocation was detected and 100% concordance between WGS and MicroSeq with PCR-seq was demonstrated.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION:The number of samples in this study was limited. In some cases, the reference embryo for PGT-M or PGT-SR parent-only haplotyping was not available owing to failed direct genotyping.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS:WGS-based PGT-A, PGT-M and PGT-SR offered a comprehensive PGT approach for haplotyping without the requirement for additional family members. It provided an improved complementary method to PGT methodologies, such as low-depth MPS- and SNP array-based methods.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S):This research was supported by the research grant from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0910201 and 2018YFC1004900), the Guangdong province science and technology project of China (2019B020226001), the Shenzhen Birth Defect Screening Project Lab (JZF No. [2016] 750) and the Shenzhen Municipal Government of China (JCYJ20170412152854656). This work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771638, 81901495 and 81971344), the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1004901 and 2016YFC0905103), the Shanghai Sailing Program (18YF1424800), the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Program (15411964000) and the Shanghai 'Rising Stars of Medical Talent' Youth Development Program Clinical Laboratory Practitioners Program (201972). The authors declare no competing interests.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:N/A.

Enhancing the Polygenic Score Catalog with tools for score calculation and ancestry normalization

The Polygenic Score Catalog: an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation

The Polygenic Score Catalog as an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation

Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools

Imputation Server PGS: an automated approach to calculate polygenic risk scores on imputation servers

Comprehensive Preimplantation Genetic Testing by Massively Parallel Sequencing

Clinical genetic counseling and translation considerations for polygenic scores in personalized risk assessments: A Practice Resource from the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Resource profile and user guide of the Polygenic Index Repository

Improving on polygenic scores across complex traits using select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) and LDpred2

Towards fair and clinically relevant polygenic predictions

comorbidPGS: An R Package Assessing Shared Predisposition between Phenotypes Using Polygenic Scores

GAPIT Version 2: an Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction

Polygenic Scores for Plasticity: A New Tool for Studying Gene-Environment Interplay

Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations

Fast and Rigorous Computation of Gene and Pathway Scores from SNP-Based Summary Statistics

PRSice-2: Polygenic Risk Score software for biobank-scale data

Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum

The GenoPred Pipeline: A Comprehensive and Scalable Pipeline for Polygenic Scoring.

Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts

Improving GWAS performance in underrepresented groups by appropriate modeling of genetics, environment, and sociocultural factors

Improving polygenic prediction from summary data by learning patterns of effect sharing across multiple phenotypes