Nicola de’Angelis,Jim Khan,Francesco Marchegiani,Giorgio Bianchi,Filippo Aisoni,Daniele Alberti,Luca Ansaloni,Walter Biffl,Osvaldo Chiara,Graziano Ceccarelli,Federico Coccolini,Enrico Cicuttin,Mathieu D’Hondt,Salomone Di Saverio,Michele Diana,Belinda De Simone,Eloy Espin-Basany,Stefan Fichtner-Feigl,Jeffry Kashuk,Ewout Kouwenhoven,Ari Leppaniemi,Nassiba Beghdadi,Riccardo Memeo,Marco Milone,Ernest Moore,Andrew Peitzmann,Patrick Pessaux,Manos Pikoulis,Michele Pisano,Frederic Ris,Massimo Sartelli,Giuseppe Spinoglio,Michael Sugrue,Edward Tan,Paschalis Gavriilidis,Dieter Weber,Yoram Kluger,Fausto Catena

Abstract:Abstract Background Robotics represents the most technologically advanced approach in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Its application in general surgery has increased progressively, with some early experience reported in emergency settings. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a systematic review of the literature to develop consensus statements about the potential use of robotics in emergency general surgery. Methods This position paper was conducted according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee was constituted to draft the position paper according to the literature review. An international expert panel then critically revised the manuscript. Each statement was voted through a web survey to reach a consensus. Results Ten studies (3 case reports, 3 case series, and 4 retrospective comparative cohort studies) have been published regarding the applications of robotics for emergency general surgery procedures. Due to the paucity and overall low quality of evidence, 6 statements are proposed as expert opinions. In general, the experts claim for a strict patient selection while approaching emergent general surgery procedures with robotics, eventually considering it for hemodynamically stable patients only. An emergency setting should not be seen as an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery if an adequate training of the operating surgical team is available. In such conditions, robotic surgery can be considered safe, feasible, and associated with surgical outcomes related to an MIS approach. However, there are some concerns regarding the adoption of robotic surgery for emergency surgeries associated with the following: (i) the availability and accessibility of the robotic platform for emergency units and during night shifts, (ii) expected longer operative times, and (iii) increased costs. Further research is necessary to investigate the role of robotic surgery in emergency settings and to explore the possibility of performing telementoring and telesurgery, which are particularly valuable in emergency situations. Conclusions Many hospitals are currently equipped with a robotic surgical platform which needs to be implemented efficiently. The role of robotic surgery for emergency procedures remains under investigation. However, its use is expanding with a careful assessment of costs and timeliness of operations. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community stressing the need for reevaluation and update processes as evidence expands in the relevant literature.

European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgeons future view on robotic cardiac surgery in Europe

How to advance from minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting to totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting: challenges in Europe versus United States of America

Embracing industry in the development of robotic coronary bypass grafting—the sun rises in the East

Robotic endovascular surgery: current and future practice

Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution

Future of robotic surgery in urology

Robotic-Assisted Solutions for Invasive Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Routine On-Ward Tasks: A Narrative Review

The role of RObotic surgery in EMergency setting (ROEM): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study on the use of robotic platform in emergency surgery

Future perspectives in robotic surgery

Surgical trainee experience and opinion of robotic surgery in surgical training and vision for the future: a snapshot study of pan-specialty surgical trainees

Robotic mitral valve surgery: a review and tips for safely negotiating the learning curve

The role of robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery for mitral valve disease

Historical landmarks in the development of robotic coronary bypass grafting

Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper

Current Expectations and Opinions on Single-port Robotic Surgery: A Survey Among European Experts by the SPARC Collaborative Group

Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Training Programs: A National Needs Assessment

Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies

From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Urologic robots and future directions

Robotically assisted mitral valve surgery-experience during the restart of a robotic program in Germany