Teaching laryngoscopy

C. P. Bellhouse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11111.x

IF: 12.893

1989-01-01

Anaesthesia

Abstract:The Sunday Telegraph (31 July 1988) featured an article about a surgical team at a London teaching hospital. The article bore the characteristics of what is known as the ‘human interest angle’ and focused on, for example, the surgeon’s penchant for fast cars and jewellery rather than anything of more medical relevance. This would not, I suspect, encourage the reader to develop great confidence in his or her medical attendants. Certainly the piece did not call to mind the phrase ‘centre of excellence’ to describe the featured hospital. My main concern, however, was the portrayed attitude and behaviour of the (named) consultant anaesthetist, who was quoted repeating the old cliche about anaesthesia being 90% boredom and 10% panic, together with the equally banal comparison between anaesthesia and the flying of an aeroplane. It is the accompanying large colour photograph of him engrossed in his newspaper during an operation which can hardly improve public perception of our specialty and its professionalism. This, I suggest, brings the profession in general and anaesthesia in particular into disrepute, which is something we hardly need in the current climate of escalating malpractice claims and increasing public scrutiny of consultant’s professional behaviour. To quote Professor Rosen, President of the Association, as published in Anaesthesia (1988; 43: 721) ‘. . . Reading or listening to tapes during the conduct of anaesthesia distracts the anaesthetist’s attention . . . If an anaesthetist’s regular attitude to work is that it is boring, then counselling is indicated.’