Molecular identification of lizard by RAPD & FINS of mitochondrial 16s rRNA gene.

S. Guha,V. Kashyap

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEGALMED.2005.07.001

IF: 2.017

Legal Medicine

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Novel fluorinated docetaxel analog for anti-hepatoma: Molecular docking and biological evaluation.

Yun Hao,Zheng-Yu Liu,Cheng Xie,Lu Zhou,Xun Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2016.03.022

IF: 5.112

2016-06-10

European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract:
Clinical Performance of Intraoral Digital Impression for Fixed Prosthodontics: a Meta-analysis.

Ling Chen,Cheng Chen,Zhi-Yong Li,Qi Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.03.010

2021-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVES:To analyze the clinical performance of the intraoral digital impression (IDI) in the fixed prosthodontics.METHODS:Databases of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the use of IDI in fixed prosthodontics until May 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. A Meta-analysis was conducted when available.RESULTS:Eleven RCTs involving 618 patients were included in this study. A total of 2 and 3 studies had low and high risks of bias, respectively, and other included studies had a medium risk of bias. Results illustrated that the IDI group could shorten the impression-taken time [SMD=-5.63, 95%CI (-11.25, -0.01), P=0.05] and improve the accuracy of the marginal fit [SMD=-0.53, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.22), P=0.000 7] compared with the conventional impression group. However, no significant difference was observed in the internal fit.CONCLUSIONS:Evidence indicated a good clinical performance of IDI for fixed prosthodontics. Notably, high-quality studies are expected to further support the conclusion.
[Behavior therapy for obesity].

H. Yoshimatsu,T. Sakata

2001-05-10

Abstract:
A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study

Franz Sebastian Schwindling,Thomas Stober

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.022

Abstract:Statement of problem: The introduction of digital techniques might improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of treatment with complete removable dental prostheses (CDs). Purpose: The purpose of this pilot clinical trial was to study and compare the clinical feasibility, complications during fabrication, and quality of 2 types of digitally designed CDs. Material and methods: Five participants were recruited into this preliminary clinical trial. For each participant, 2 pairs of digital CDs were designed. Prosthesis bases were fabricated by using identical data, either by milling from polymethyl methacrylate blanks or by injection molding. The treatment involved 4 clinical appointments. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made with custom trays and were subsequently digitalized. After evaluating esthetics and function with trial dentures, the CD bases were fabricated. To evaluate the workflow and quality of the prostheses, the clinical outcome was measured on 6-point scales ranging from poor (grade 6) to excellent (grade 1). For both prosthesis types, the following aspects were examined: fit, retention, esthetics, phonetics, maxillomandibular relation, and occlusion. Results: Both types of digital CDs could be fabricated without major complications. Only a few minor complications occurred during the fabrication process, predominantly esthetic issues. No pronounced difference was found between the prostheses concerning functional aspects. The definitive esthetic outcome was rated as very good. Conclusions: The CDs fabricated using digital technology met the clinical requirements. However, more research is needed to confirm the results of this investigation.
CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of patient‐ and clinician‐reported outcomes and costs

Dana Jafarpour,Praveen Bhoopathi Haricharan,Raphael Freitas de Souza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13738

2024-05-28

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Abstract:Statement of Problem Computer‐aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) have been increasingly used to enhance the patient and clinician experiences with removable complete dentures (CDs). Yet, evidence from systematic reviews is lacking to validate the clinical significance of these digital prostheses. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to compare CAD/CAM CDs with the traditional ones in terms of patient and clinician‐reported outcomes, post‐insertion adjustment visits and costs. Materials and Methods An electronic search of four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL; last update: May 2022] was performed to retrieve clinical studies comparing CAD/CAM and traditional CDs. Two independent reviewers screened the articles, extracted data (methods and outcomes) and assessed risk of bias of the included studies. The following outcomes underwent meta‐analysis (random‐effects model): overall patient and clinician satisfaction, oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), number of post‐insertion adjustment visits, as well as laboratory and total costs. Results This review included 11 studies. Meta‐analysis revealed that CAD/CAM CDs are comparable to the traditional CDs in terms of overall patient satisfaction and OHRQoL. Clinician‐reported data depended on the manufacturing technique: whereas milled CDs performed better than traditional CDs in terms of clinician satisfaction and number of adjustments, 3D printed and traditional CDs were similar. Fabrication of CAD/CAM CDs required significantly less laboratory and overall costs than the traditional CDs. Conclusions There is some evidence showing that CAD/CAM CDs are at least comparable to traditional CDs. Further well‐designed randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the performance of specific CAD/CAM approaches for manufacturing CDs, however.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
[Evaluation of Production and Clinical Working Time of Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Custom Trays for Complete Denture].

L Wei,H Chen,Y S Zhou,Y C Sun,S X Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-167x.2017.01.015

2017-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the technician fabrication time and clinical working time of custom trays fabricated using two different methods, the three-dimensional printing custom trays and the conventional custom trays, and to prove the feasibility of the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom trays in clinical use from the perspective of clinical time cost.METHODS:Twenty edentulous patients were recruited into this study, which was prospective, single blind, randomized self-control clinical trials. Two custom trays were fabricated for each participant. One of the custom trays was fabricated using functional suitable denture (FSD) system through CAD/CAM process, and the other was manually fabricated using conventional methods. Then the final impressions were taken using both the custom trays, followed by utilizing the final impression to fabricate complete dentures respectively. The technician production time of the custom trays and the clinical working time of taking the final impression was recorded.RESULTS:The average time spent on fabricating the three-dimensional printing custom trays using FSD system and fabricating the conventional custom trays manually were (28.6±2.9) min and (31.1±5.7) min, respectively. The average time spent on making the final impression with the three-dimensional printing custom trays using FSD system and the conventional custom trays fabricated manually were (23.4±11.5) min and (25.4±13.0) min, respectively. There was significant difference in the technician fabrication time and the clinical working time between the three-dimensional printing custom trays using FSD system and the conventional custom trays fabricated manually (P<0.05).CONCLUSION:The average time spent on fabricating three-dimensional printing custom trays using FSD system and making the final impression with the trays are less than those of the conventional custom trays fabricated manually, which reveals that the FSD three-dimensional printing custom trays is less time-consuming both in the clinical and laboratory process than the conventional custom trays. In addition, when we manufacture custom trays by three-dimensional printing method, there is no need to pour preliminary cast after taking the primary impression, therefore, it can save the impression material and model material. As to completing denture restoration, manufacturing custom trays using FSD system is worth being popularized.
Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis

B. Worster,Declan Kennedy Bell,V. Roy,A. Cunningham,M. LaNoue,S. Parks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909116686733

Abstract:Background: Palliative care is associated with significant benefits, including reduced pain and suffering, an increased likelihood of patients dying in their preferred location, and decreased health-care expenditures. Racial and ethnic disparities are well-documented in hospice use and referral patterns; however, it is unclear whether these disparities apply to inpatient palliative care services. Objective: To determine if race is a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, patient enrollment in hospice, and patients’ overall hospital length of stay among patients of an inpatient palliative care service. Design: Retrospective noncomparative analysis. Setting: Urban academic medical center in the United States. Patients: 3207 patients referred to an inpatient palliative care service between March 2006 and April 2015. Measurements: Time to palliative care consult, disposition of hospice/not hospice (excluding patients who died), and hospital length of stay among patients by racial (Asian, black, Native American/Eskimo, Hispanic, white, Unknown) and ethnic (Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic, Unknown) background. Results: Race was not a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Similarly, black/white, Hispanic/white, and Asian/white variables were not significant predictors of hospice enrollment (Ps > .05). Limitations: Study was conducted at 1 urban academic medical center, limiting generalizability; hospital race and ethnicity categorizations may also limit interpretation of results. Conclusions: In this urban hospital, race was not a predictor of time to inpatient palliative care service consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Confirmatory studies of inpatient palliative care services in other institutions are needed.
[Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of a Kind of Digital Complete Denture].

L Wei,D Zou,H Chen,S X Pan,Y C Sun,Y S Zhou

2020-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy of a kind of complete dentures fabricated using computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflow with that of the complete denture fabricated using conventional workflow.METHODS:Twenty edentulous patients were included in this prospective, single-blind, self-controlled clinical trial. Two pairs of complete dentures were fabricated for each participant: one using the functional suitable denture (FSD) system with CAD/CAM, and the other using conventional fabrication workflow. In the final delivery appointment, the conventional dentures worn by the participant for 3 months at first. Then the participant swapped to wear digital denture for another 3 months. The patients' satisfaction and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and oral health impact profile (OHIP-20E) at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months following denture delivery. In addition, the masticatory efficiency of each pair of dentures was measured after three months adaptation period for each type of dentures.RESULTS:The VAS scores of the twenty patients in FSD denture group on general satisfaction, ease of cleaning, ability to speak, esthetics, stability and oral health status on these six domains were higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery. While the VAS cores in FSD denture group on comfort, ability to chew and ability to chew up were the same as those of conventional denture group. But there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The VAS score on each domain in FSD denture group was higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery, three domains of which reached statistical significance (P < 0.05), involving functional limitation, psychological discomfort and total. The masticatory performance of the FSD denture (1.20±0.54) was slightly higher than that for the conventional denture (1.16±0.53), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.691).CONCLUSIONS:The clinical efficacy of the FSD complete denture is comparable to that of the conventional complete denture. As for patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life, FSD dentures received comparable scores as conventional complete dentures did.
Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Danush Ahrberg,Hans Christoph Lauer,Martin Ahrberg,Paul Weigl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6

2015-06-14

Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract:ObjectivesThe aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia crowns and three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) resulting from direct versus indirect digitalization. The efficiency of both methods was analyzed.Materials and methodsIn 25 patients, 17 single crowns and eight three-unit FDPs were fabricated with all-ceramic zirconia using CAD/CAM technology. Each patient underwent two different impression methods; a computer-aided impression with Lava C.O.S. (CAI) and a conventional polyether impression with Impregum pent soft (CI). The working time for each group was recorded. Before insertion, the marginal and internal fit was recorded using silicone replicas of the frameworks. Each sample was cut into four sections and evaluated at four sites (marginal gap, mid-axial wall, axio-occlusal transition, centro-occlusal site) under ×64 magnification. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to detect significant differences between the two groups in terms of marginal and internal fit (α = 0.05).ResultsThe mean for the marginal gap was 61.08 μm (±24.77 μm) for CAI compared with 70.40 μm (±28.87 μm) for CI, which was a statistically significant difference. The other mean values for CAI and CI, respectively, were as follows in micrometers (± standard deviation): 88.27 (±41.49) and 92.13 (±49.87) at the mid-axial wall; 144.78 (±46.23) and 155.60 (±55.77) at the axio-occlusal transition; and 155.57 (49.85) and 171.51 (±60.98) at the centro-occlusal site. The CAI group showed significantly lower values of internal fit at the centro-occlusal site.A quadrant scan with a computer-aided impression was 5 min 6 s more time efficient when compared with a conventional impression, and a full-arch scan was 1 min 34 s more efficient.ConclusionsAlthough both direct and indirect digitalization facilitate the fabrication of single crowns and three-unit FDPs with clinically acceptable marginal fit, a significantly better marginal fit was noted with direct digitalization. Digital impressions are also less time-consuming for the dental practitioner and the patient.Clinical relevanceThe results show that a direct, intraoral, digitalized impression technique is more accurate and efficient when compared with conventional impressions in fabricating single crowns and three-unit FDPs.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Budget Impact Analysis: Digital Workflow Significantly Reduces Costs of Implant Supported Overdentures (IODs)

Thomas Van de Winkel,Frans Delfos,Bart van Oirschot,Thomas Maal,Eddy Adang,Gert Meijer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13413

2024-11-19

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:Background For edentulism, an implant supported removable complete overdenture (IOD) is an attractive solution to restore patients' chewing capacity, aesthetics, and self‐esteem, however, treatment is expensive and time consuming. Purpose/Aim To estimate the decline in costs for digitally designed and CAD/CAM fabricated IODs (3D‐IODs) compared to conventionally fabricated IODs (C‐IODs) at comparable general health related quality of life (GHRQoL). Materials and MethodA randomized crossover study enrolled 36 fully edentulous patients, in whom six maxillary implants were placed together with two mandibular implants, if not already present. At the start of the study, a set of C‐IODs and 3D‐IODs was fabricated for each patient. All patients wore each IOD‐type for 1 year: first the 3D‐IOD and the second year a C‐IOD, or vice versa. At all three‐time points patients general QoL was assessed using the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire as well as the SF‐36 from which the SF‐6D was obtained, to research the anticipation of no significant difference. To enable cost consequence analysis (CCA), both costs made within healthcare and patient costs were assessed. Subsequently, a budget impact analysis (BIA) was performed to demonstrate the potential savings. ResultsNo differences in general GHRQoL were seen between C‐IOD (M = 0.840, SD = 0.177) and 3D‐IOD (M = 0.837, SD = 0.156) (paired t‐test (N = 31): p = 0.880). With respect to the total costs for a complete IOD, however, the digital approach showed a reduction in initial total costs of 14.2% (€4700.33 vs. €4030.61: p

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study

Sabrina Maniewicz,Yoshiki Imamura,Nada El Osta,Murali Srinivasan,Frauke Müller,Najla Chebib

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.006

Abstract:Statement of problem: Clinical evidence is sparse on whether dentures fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) methods afford superior fit and retention when compared with those fabricated conventionally. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical controlled crossover study was to evaluate the peak retention force and fit of CAD-CAM manufactured (3D printed and milled) maxillary complete denture bases and conventional heat-polymerized bases (control). Material and methods: Twenty participants with edentulous maxillary arches were recruited. Impressions were made with a border-molded custom tray, and the resulting definitive cast was scanned. The conventional base was manufactured on the definitive cast with a hook and a 45-degree platform with a central notch and 2 lateral notches. The scan of the definitive cast was used for the fabrication of a milled and a printed base. The platform and hook position on the conventional base were transferred digitally to the milled and printed bases. All bases were scanned. A traction dynamometer was orientated into the notches, and retention was evaluated in the post dam and tuberosity areas. Scans were imported into a comparison software program which matched scans to their corresponding reference and performed a 3-dimensional comparison. The Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare between groups (confidence interval: 95%, α=.05). Results: Nineteen participants with a mean ±standard deviation age of 64.1 ±14.7 years completed all clinical sessions. No significant difference in peak retention was measured between milled (MB1), printed (PB1), and conventional (CB) bases in the post dam (CB: 12.44 ±9.62 N, PB1: 16.08 ±15.28 N, MB1: 14.52 ±17.07 N) and right tuberosity area (CB: 8.99 ±7.82 N, PB1: 11.28 ±9.57 N, MB1: 11.99 ±12.10 N). In the left tuberosity area, peak retention was lower for CB (10.03 ±8.39 N) than PB1 (14.98 ±14.72 N) and MB1 (13.55 ±15.53 N; P=.05). Compared with the definitive cast, the fit of the conventional base (0.18 ±0.01 mm) was closer than the printed (0.21 ±0.03 mm) and milled bases (0.21 ±0.02 mm) (P<.001). Conclusions: The CD bases manufactured by CAD-CAM techniques provided retention and fit similar to that of conventionally manufactured bases and can therefore be considered suitable techniques.
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes and Time Efficiency Between a Digital Complete Denture and Conventional Complete Denture A Pilot Study

Kehui Deng,Yong Wang,Yongsheng Zhou,Yuchun Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2022.09.016

2023-01-01

Abstract:Background. The authors of this study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and time efficiency between digital and conventional complete denture restorations and propose suggestions for clinical use. Methods. The authors used digital (functionally suitable digital complete denture [FSD]) and conventional complete denture restorations to make 2 dentures each for 10 edentulous patients. All the operations of both techniques before denture delivery were completed in the first 4 visits, and then 2 dentures were delivered successively for the patients. The clinical and laboratory times were recorded to evaluate the time efficiency; treatment outcomes were evaluated via scoring the denture satisfaction of the dentist and patients in a double-blind manner. Results. The satisfaction scores of FSDs (7.6-9.6 [dentist's scores], 8.4-10 [patients' scores]) were higher than those of conventional dentures (7.2-9.7 [dentist's score], 7.4-9.8 [patients' scores]), but there were no significant differences. The clinical and laboratory operation times of the FSD group were less than those of the conventional group, saving an average of 28.0 minutes and 64.3 minutes in the clinic and laboratory, respectively. Conclusions. FSD technology can improve the efficiency of clinical and laboratory operations and shorten the manufacturing cycle of dentures. The occlusion stability of FSDs was statistically better than that of traditional dentures, but there was no statistical difference in other clinical indicators. Practical Implications. FSD technology is low cost and easy to operate and has several applications. Compared with conventional complete denture restoration technology, FSDs can save time and have a comparable clinical effect. This clinical trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR1900021722.
Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review

Marion Bessadet,Noémie Drancourt,Nada El Osta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.003

IF: 4.148

2024-02-02

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abstract:Statement of problem Time and cost are factors that influence a patient's decision on dental prosthetic treatment. Evidence is needed to demonstrate that restoration using digital systems is more rapid and less costly than the conventional process. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze and compare the duration and cost of fixed dental prostheses fabricated using digital and conventional methods from scanning or impression making to delivery of the prosthesis. Material and methods A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P 2015) guidelines. The analysis methods and inclusion criteria were documented in a protocol registered in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023458734). The bibliographic search was carried out using PubMed, Cochrane, and PROSPERO databases. The main keywords used were (Prosthodontic OR restorative dentistry OR denture) AND (CAD CAM OR Digital workflow OR Computer Dentistry OR Digital Design) AND (Economic OR cost OR Financial OR time efficiency). Two investigators undertook the different steps of article selection. Results A total of 8 articles published between 2010 and 2023 were found for the qualitative synthesis by using the search criteria. Two studies showed that conventional impressions took more time than digital scans for the fabrication of a single crown, and 1 study showed the opposite. One study found that a digital scan was faster than conventional impression making for the fabrication of a 3-unit fixed partial denture, and another study showed the opposite. The dental laboratory technician spent more time on the conventional workflow than the digital workflow for the 3-unit framework and veneering process. No difference was found between conventional and digital workflows for clinical evaluation and chairside adjustment for the fabrication of a single crown. No articles have compared the cost of fixed prostheses. Conclusions The digital pathway can shorten the laboratory process. However, the duration of the impression or scan may vary depending on the technique used. Studies are needed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the fabrication of tooth-supported restorations.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
A Framework for Patient-Specific Spinal Intervention Simulation: Application to Lumbar Spinal Durotomy Repair

Jonathan C. Lau,L. Denning,S. Lownie,T. Peters,E. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-185

Abstract:We present a functional and patient-specific lumbar phantom for the training of spinal durotomy and dura closure under microscopic view, consisting of a lumbar model, pressurized dural surrogate, together immersed in a tissue-mimicking layer simulating fat, muscle and skin. The lumbar model was derived from a patient computed tomography scan, preserving the natural shape and curvature of the lumbar column. The inclusion of the simulated soft-tissue layer was critical for preserving the surgical ergonomics and presented a realistic view under the surgical microscope. As the success of dura repair is indicated by the watertight closure of the thecal sac, the dura surrogate was connected to a pressurized and closed-loop water system to provide functional cerebrospinal fluid leakage during durotomy. This functional phantom is inexpensive to construct, provides a realistic tactile and visual environment for spinal durotomy repair, and can be easily extended to simulate other patient-specific spinal interventions.
Duplicating Complete Dentures with Conventional and Digital Methods: Comparisons of Trueness and Efficiency

Li Chen,Deli Li,Jianfeng Zhou,Wei-Shao Lin,Jianguo Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10030035

2022-01-01

Dentistry Journal

Abstract:Background: A complete denture (CD) can be duplicated with a conventional or digital protocol. However, there are no comparative studies of these methods. This study aimed to compare the trueness and efficiency of conventional and digital CD duplication methods. Methods: A mandibular CD was digitized as the virtual reference model and duplicated using five methods (n = 10). The trueness (root mean square (RMS)) was calculated for the whole denture and across the dentition, cameo denture extension, and intaglio portions. The manual labor time spent during denture duplication was also recorded at different steps. The trueness and labor time comparisons were statistically analyzed among the five groups (α = 0.05). Results: The conventional group was the least true with the largest RMS (mean, 95% CI) in all of the comparisons. The four digital groups yielded similar trueness values across the dentition, cameo denture extension, and intaglio areas, yet they had a significant difference in the whole denture comparison between the Digital-CBCT-SLA printer (0.17, 0.15–0.19 mm) and Digital-Laboratory Scanner-SLA printer (0.13, 0.11–0.15 mm). The conventional protocol required longer trimming and finishing time (7.55 ± 1.02 min), as well as total labor time (27.64 ± 1.72 min) than the other four digital techniques. Conclusions: The conventional CD duplication method was less true and efficient than digital techniques.
Influence of impression method and shoulder design on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin onlay restorations

Muyue Li,Ben Ma,Zhuanyuan Zhou,Wei Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35915

IF: 3.776

2024-08-08

Heliyon

Abstract:Objective: This in-vitro study investigates the influence of two different impression techniques and two shoulder designs on the marginal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing restorations. Methods: Forty mandibular first premolars were cast into dental arch models for this in vitro study. Fragile cusps and concavities on the mesial-buccal-occlusal surfaces were treated, with 2 mm of the occlusal surface removed. Teeth were categorised into two groups based on shoulder preparation. Digital scanning using a 3Shape 3D scanner identified them further for allocation into conventional and digital impression subgroups. The restorations were created from nanoceramic resin blocks using prescribed guidelines. Microscopic evaluation assessed the restoration's marginal adaptation, with data analysed using SPSS 27.0. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Digital intraoral scanning consistently demonstrated smaller marginal gaps than the traditional impression method, regardless of shoulder preparation, with the differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). Furthermore, shoulder preparation significantly reduced the marginal gaps in both the digital and traditional impression groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The onlay preparation design with a shoulder led to restorations with improved marginal adaptation compared with the design with no shoulder. Direct digital impression techniques produced restorations within a better marginal discrepancy than traditional impressions.
Clinical Evaluation of a One-Piece Polyetheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Fabricated Using a Novel Digital Workflow: A Self-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Jung-min Yoon,Yunsong Liu,Yuchun Sun,Hongqiang Ye,Yongsheng Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13907

2024-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE:To explore the clinical application of one-piece polyetheretherketone (PEEK) removable partial dentures (RPDs) fabricated using a novel digital workflow and to evaluate their weights and fits in vivo and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Fifteen cases with posterior partially edentulous situations were selected, and each patient received two types of RPDs, including a novel digital workflow (test group) and a conventional workflow (control group). For the test group, one-piece RPDs were designed through three-dimensional (3D) methods by scanning stone casts and fabricated by milling PEEK discs. Each RPD was weighed. The gaps between the oral tissue and RPDs in each group were duplicated using a polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) replica and measured by 3D analysis. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used to compare the differences in the weight, the gaps of each RPD, and VAS values between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance tests was used to compare the differences in the gap among different components in each group. RESULTS:The RPD in the test group weighed less than that in the control group (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences in the gaps of denture bases and rests (p > 0.05) were found between the two groups, but the gaps of major connectors in the test group were significantly smaller than in the control group (p < 0.05). The VAS scores for comfortableness and masticatory efficiency were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05) but the scores for the aesthetic appearance of the clasps in the test group were significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:One-piece PEEK RPDs manufactured using a novel digital workflow weighed less than conventional RPDs and exhibited a clinically acceptable internal fit. Although the aesthetic appearance of the PEEK clasps was superior to the control, there is still room for improvement.
Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Can Wang,Yi-Fei Shi,Pei-Jin Xie,Jun-Hua Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.004

Abstract:Statement of problem: Reports on digital complete dentures (CDs) are increasing. However, systematic reviews on their accuracy and influencing factors are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of digital CDs and to summarize influencing factors. Material and methods: An electronic search of the English language literature from January 2009 to October 2019 was performed in the database PubMed/MEDLINE, with the results enriched by manual searches and citation mining. Factors investigated in the selected articles included the fabrication technique, type of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system, shape of reference model, long-term service, analytical method, and statistical indicators. Results: A total of 522 articles were identified, of which 14 in vitro articles met the inclusion criteria. Eight articles compared the adaptation of the denture base between digital and conventional methods, 4 studies evaluated the occlusal discrepancies, 4 compared the trueness or adaptation of the denture fabricated with CAD-CAM milling and 3D printing, 1 compared the denture adaptation with 4 different CAD-CAM systems, and 2 evaluated the adaptation of the denture base before and after incubation in artificial saliva. Conclusions: Most of the studies reported clinically acceptable values for the occlusal trueness and adaptation of digital CDs. The digital CDs showed similar or better adaptation than conventionally fabricated CDs, and the greatest misfit of the intaglio surface was reported in the posterior palatal seal area and border seal area. The fabrication technique, CAD-CAM system, and long-term service were statistically significant in relation to denture accuracy. Clarification is needed concerning the accuracy of digital CDs according to the shape of the cast, the parameters related to the CAD-CAM process, the analytical method, and the statistical indicators. No clear conclusions can be drawn about the superiority of CAD-CAM milling and 3D printing regarding denture accuracy.
Occlusal Contact and Clearance of Posterior Implant-Supported Single Crowns Designed by Two Different Methods: a Self-Controlled Study

Mingzhu He,Tingting Pu,Qian Ding,Yao Sun,Pengfei Wang,Yuchun Sun,Lei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02847-w

2023-01-01

BMC Oral Health

Abstract:Background Precise occlusal design of implant-supported fixed prostheses is difficult to achieve by the conventional wax-up method, often requiring chairside adjustments. The computer-aided design (CAD) method is promising. This study aims to compare the occlusal contacts and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD and conventional methods. Methods Sample size calculation indicated fourteen samples per group. Two sets of type-IV plaster casts with a single implant analog inserted in the posterior teeth region were mounted as master casts in a mechanical articulator in maximal intercuspal position (MIP). Seven working cast sets were obtained from each master cast by a closed tray technique, and mounted in MIP. Two implant-supported single crowns were designed with an occlusal clearance to achieve light occlusal contact in each working cast set by CAD and conventional method, separately. For the CAD group, the crown was designed in digital models obtained by scanning the working casts. For the conventional group, wax-up of the crown was prepared on the working casts and scanned to generate a STL file. In the working and master casts, mean and minimum occlusal clearances in the designed occlusal contact area of the both finished prostheses were calculated using the occlusal clearance (OC) and occlusal record (OR) method. The prostheses’ occlusion was evaluated in master casts. Results For the evaluation in the working casts, both design methods had similar mean occlusal clearances by the OC method (195.4 ± 43.8 vs. 179.8 ± 41.8 μm; P = 0.300), while CAD group resulted in a significantly larger minimum occlusal clearance in the designed occlusal contact area (139.5 ± 52.3 vs. 99.8 ± 43.8 μm; P = 0.043). Both design methods had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances by the OR method ( P > 0.05). For the evaluation in the master casts, both design techniques had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances, number and distribution of occlusal contacts, and lateral interference ratios ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Occlusal contact and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD method can be at least as good as those designed by the conventional wax-up method.
Effect of Duplication Techniques on the Fitting Accuracy of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Injection-Molded Mandibular Complete Denture Bases

Abdel-Naser M. Emam,Ahmed Ayman El-Esawy,Mohammed Hamad Alyami,Yasser Baraka,Mohammed M. Gad,Mohamed Ahmed Helal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12020032

2024-02-03

Dentistry Journal

Abstract:Background: Digital technology has been introduced in prosthodontics, and it has been widely used in denture duplication instead of a conventional denture duplication technique. However, research comparing different denture duplication techniques and how they affect the fitting accuracy of the denture base is scarce. Objectives: The aim was to assess the impact of duplication techniques on the accuracy of the fitting surface of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled, 3D-printed, and injection-molded complete denture bases (CDBs). Methodology: This study involved fabricating a mandibular complete denture base with three marked dimples as reference marks (A, B, and C at the incisive papilla, right molar, and left molar areas) using a conventional compression molded technique. This denture was then scanned to generate a standard tessellation language (STL) file; after that, it was duplicated using three different techniques (milling, 3D printing, and injection molding) and five denture base resin materials—two milled CAD-CAM materials (AvaDent and IvoBase), two 3D-printed materials (NextDent and HARZ Labs), and one injection-molded material (iFlextm). Based on the denture base type, the study divided them into five groups (each with n = 10). An evaluation of duplication accuracy was conducted on the fitting surface of each complete denture base (CDB) using two assessment methods. The first method was a two-dimensional evaluation, which entailed linear measurements of the distances (A–B, A–C, and B–C) between reference points on both the scanned reference mandibular denture and the duplicated dentures. Additionally, a three-dimensional superimposition technique was employed, involving the overlay of the STL files of the dentures onto the reference denture's STL file. The collected data underwent statistical analysis using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's pairwise post hoc tests. Results: Both evaluation techniques showed significant differences in fitting surface accuracy between the tested CDBs (p ˂ 0.001), as indicated by one-way ANOVA. In addition, the milled CDBs (AvaDent and IvoBase) had significantly higher fitting surface accuracy than the other groups (p ˂ 0.001) and were followed by 3D-printed CDBs (NextDent and HARZ Labs), while the injection-molded (iFlextm) CDBs had the lowest accuracy (p ˂ 0.001). Conclusions: The duplication technique of complete dentures using a CAD-CAM milling system produced superior fitting surface accuracy compared to the 3D-printing and injection-molded techniques.

Molecular identification of lizard by RAPD & FINS of mitochondrial 16s rRNA gene.

Novel fluorinated docetaxel analog for anti-hepatoma: Molecular docking and biological evaluation.

Clinical Performance of Intraoral Digital Impression for Fixed Prosthodontics: a Meta-analysis.

[Behavior therapy for obesity].

A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study

CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of patient‐ and clinician‐reported outcomes and costs

[Evaluation of Production and Clinical Working Time of Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Custom Trays for Complete Denture].

Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis

[Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of a Kind of Digital Complete Denture].

Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Budget Impact Analysis: Digital Workflow Significantly Reduces Costs of Implant Supported Overdentures (IODs)

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes and Time Efficiency Between a Digital Complete Denture and Conventional Complete Denture A Pilot Study

Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review

A Framework for Patient-Specific Spinal Intervention Simulation: Application to Lumbar Spinal Durotomy Repair

Duplicating Complete Dentures with Conventional and Digital Methods: Comparisons of Trueness and Efficiency

Influence of impression method and shoulder design on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin onlay restorations

Clinical Evaluation of a One-Piece Polyetheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Fabricated Using a Novel Digital Workflow: A Self-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Occlusal Contact and Clearance of Posterior Implant-Supported Single Crowns Designed by Two Different Methods: a Self-Controlled Study

Effect of Duplication Techniques on the Fitting Accuracy of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Injection-Molded Mandibular Complete Denture Bases