Abstract:Purpose of the study The goal behind this study is to answer the question “In tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs), does the digital impression techniques compared to fabrications using conventional impression methods improve the marginal and internal fit? Background The incorporation of digital technology in the fabrication of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) has accelerated over the past decade. This study is directed at evaluating the marginal and internal fit of FPDs manufactured using digital approaches compared to conventional techniques. The need for updated data has encouraged this review. Materials and methods An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Grey Database to identify relevant studies. The Modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the risk of bias in in vitro experiments. The key results of this meta-analysis were the standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each main variance, marginal fit, and internal fit between the digital and conventional techniques. Additional analyses were performed to assess the significance of three subgroup parameters: method of digitalization, cement spacer thickness, and span length, and their influence on the fit of the FPDs. Results Based on predefined criteria, of the seven articles included in this systematic review, only five were selected for the quantitative data analysis. The marginal fit results were ( P = 0.06; SMD: -1.88; 95% CI: − 3.88, 0.11) ( P > 0.05) and the internal fit results were ( P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.10) ( P < 0.05). Regarding the subgroup analyses, the method of digitalization subgroup results were ( P = 0.35; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) and ( P = 0.80; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively. The span length results were ( P = 0.10; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) for marginal fit and ( P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for internal fit. The cement spacer thickness ( P = 0.01; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) and ( P = 0.04; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively. Conclusion Tooth-retained fixed partial dentures FPDs produced by digital scanning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems can significantly enhance the internal fit compared with those manufactured by traditional methods. Intraoral scanners can replace conventional impressions for the fabrication of FPDs because they minimize the operating time and reduce patient pain. Further clinical studies are required to obtain more conclusive results. Systematic review registration This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42021261397.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two impression methods for the fabrication of mandibular complete dentures

A randomized controlled trial of the different impression methods for the complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes

Clinical Performance of Intraoral Digital Impression for Fixed Prosthodontics: a Meta-analysis.

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study

CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of patient‐ and clinician‐reported outcomes and costs

[Evaluation of Production and Clinical Working Time of Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Custom Trays for Complete Denture].

Oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction using three-dimensional printed dentures: A crossover randomized controlled trial

[Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of a Kind of Digital Complete Denture].

Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Budget Impact Analysis: Digital Workflow Significantly Reduces Costs of Implant Supported Overdentures (IODs)

Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study

The Impact of Digitization and Conventional Techniques on the Fit of Fixed Partial Dentures FPDs: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes and Time Efficiency Between a Digital Complete Denture and Conventional Complete Denture A Pilot Study

Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review

Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method

Duplicating Complete Dentures with Conventional and Digital Methods: Comparisons of Trueness and Efficiency

Influence of impression method and shoulder design on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin onlay restorations

A Comparison of the Accuracy Between a Digital Fabrication Workflow and a Conventional Fabrication Workflow for Occlusal Appliances: A Pilot Study

Clinical Evaluation of a One-Piece Polyetheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Fabricated Using a Novel Digital Workflow: A Self-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies