Abstract:Self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence involve misbeliefs about the self, others, and world. They are often considered mistaken. Here we explore whether they might be adaptive, and further, whether they might be explicable in Bayesian terms. We administered a difficult perceptual judgment task with and without social influence (suggestions from a cooperating or competing partner). Crucially, the social influence was uninformative. We found that participants heeded the suggestions most under the most uncertain conditions and that they did so with high confidence, particularly if they were more paranoid. Model fitting to participant behavior revealed that their prior beliefs changed depending on whether the partner was a collaborator or competitor, however, those beliefs did not differ as a function of paranoia. Instead, paranoia, self-deception, and overconfidence were associated with participants' perceived instability of their own performance. These data are consistent with the idea that self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence flourish under uncertainty, and have their roots in low self-esteem, rather than excessive social concern. The model suggests that spurious beliefs can have value-self-deception is irrational yet can facilitate optimal behavior. This occurs even at the expense of monetary rewards, perhaps explaining why self-deception and paranoia contribute to costly decisions which can spark financial crashes and devastating wars.

Censored Beliefs and Wishful Thinking

Wishful Thinking is Risky Thinking

Coherent Distorted Beliefs

Bayesianism and wishful thinking are compatible

Persuading a Wishful Thinker

Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Distorted Expectations

Optimism, overconfidence, and moral hazard

Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking

Heterogeneity in Individual Beliefs and Its Implication for Valuing Willingness to Pay

Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence

Over-representation of Extreme Events in Decision-Making: A Rational Metacognitive Account

Betting Market Equilibrium with Heterogeneous Beliefs: A Prospect Theory-Based Model

Apparent sunk cost effect in rational agents

Behavioral Portfolio Selection in Continuous Time

Implications of Belief Distribution and Loss Aversion for Betting Market Anomalies

Belief patterns with information processing

Expected utility theory with probability grids and preference formation

Optimal Consumption-Portfolio Rules with Biased Beliefs

A new perspective on Misbeliefs: A computational model for perceived control

Extreme Outcomes Accentuate Overweighting of Low Probabilities and Underweighting of High Probabilities in Experience‐Based Choice

Optimism Bias, Portfolio Delegation, and Economic Welfare