Epidemic Haemorrhagic Fever

U. Carcassi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4819.1094
IF: 202.731
1953-05-16
The Lancet
Abstract:potatoes must be sprayed to control Colorado beetle, flea beetles, and various species of sucking insects. Some control had been obtained with sprays containing arsenic, nicotine, and rotenone, but the introduction of D.D.T. resulted in the yield rising from 155 bushels per acre in 1946 to 211 bushels in 1949. While there are therefore strong reasons for using the newer insecticides, they have some serious disadvantages in addition to toxicity to mammals. Though controlling one pest, they have sometimes permitted another species to increase and become a pest. For instance, the use of D.D.T. to control codling moth can result in serious outbreaks of red spider mite, because the D.D.T. destroys the beneficial insects that normally keep the mite in check. Not only are the newer insecticides highly insecticidal on immediate application, but some remain toxic both by contact and ingestion for quite a long time after application. They may therefore kill a wide range of insect species, including the beneficial predators, parasites, and pollinators. For this reason great care must be exercised in the selection and use of any new insecticide if seriously harmful effects are to be avoided. Some mistakes have already been made, and it seems inevitable that others will occur in the future. They should not be made an excuse for abandoning the search for better means of chemical control, but point to the need for further research to increase our knowledge of the interaction of the insecticide with its biological environment so that it can be used to the best advantage. While the increase of food supplies and other essential crops obtained by means of the newer insecticides is the justification for their use in spite of their poison risk, it is essential that all concerned with their use should enforce measures to reduce those risks to a minimum. In addition to the safety regulations normally in force for the manufacture and transport of poisons, there are also the Agriculture (Poisonous Substances) Regulations, 1953. These were introduced as a result of the work of Professor S. Zuckerman's second working party, and were commented on recently in these columns.2 A third working party under Professor Zuckerman's chairmanship is now considering the risks to the natural flora and fauna of the countryside from toxic substances used in agriculture. The risk of chronic toxicity is much more difficult to assess and to eliminate. Permissible residue limits may be set, but it is not easy to ensure that they are adhered to. This problem is particularly difficult with systemic insecticides, where the chemical is absorbed and translocated by the plant and may be continually picked up by the roots if the soil contains it. This aspect is receiving attention from all the parties interested in the application of chemicals for plant protection. In 1942 the Ministry of Agriculture and the Department of Agriculture for Scotland, in collaboration with the Association of British Insecticide Manufacturers, started a voluntary scheme for the approval of crop protection products; this has already proved to be a considerable safeguard. Finally, research is being carried out to find synthetic insecticides that are less toxic to mammals. "Malathon," one of the recently introduced organo-phosphorus series, is said to have a low toxicity, and "allethrin," a synthetic product with molecular structures based on those of the active constituents of pyrethrum flowers, is regarded as having a negligible poison risk.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?