Abstract:Cristina Lalmolda, 1, 2 Pablo Flórez, 1 Marta Corral, 3 Ana Hernández Voth, 3 Carles Grimau, 1 Javier Sayas, 2 Manel Luján 1, 2, 4 1 Pneumology Department, Corporació Sanitària I Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain; 2 CIBERES, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en red, Mallorca, Spain; 3 Pneumology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; 4 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain Correspondence: Manel Luján Pneumology Department, Corporació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Parc Taulí 1, 08208 Sabadell, Campus de la UAB, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Spain Tel +34937231010 Email Purpose: The European Task Force for chronic non-invasive ventilation in stable COPD recommends the use of high pressure-support (PS) level to maximize the decrease in PaCO2. It is possible that the ventilator model can influence the need for higher or lower pressure levels. Research Question: To determine the differences between ventilators in a bench model with an increased inspiratory demand; and to compare the degree of muscular unloading measured by parasternal electromyogram (EMGpara) provided by the different ventilators in real patients with stable COPD. Patients and Methods: Bench: four levels of increasing progressive effort were programmed. The response of nine ventilators to four levels of PS and EPAP of 5 cm H2O was studied. The pressure-time product was determined at 300 and 500 msec (PTP 300/500). Clinical Study: The ventilators were divided into two groups, based on the result of the bench test. Severe COPD patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) were studied, randomly comparing the performance of one ventilator from each group. Muscle unloading was measured by the decrease in EMGpara from its baseline value. Results: There were significant differences in PTP 300 and PTP 500 in the bench study. Based on these results, home ventilators were classified into two groups; group 1 included four models with higher PTP 300. Ten COPD patients were recruited for the clinical study. Group 1 ventilators showed greater muscle unloading at the same PS than group 2. Conclusion: The scale of pressure support in NIV for high intensity ventilation may be influenced by the ventilator model. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03373175. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, parasternal electromyogram, pressure support, pressure-time product, respiratory muscle unloading, rise time Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease with high mortality and morbidity in clinical practice. A high percentage of patients with advanced disease develop chronic respiratory failure and require nocturnal non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment. In some European countries, COPD is already the leading cause of prescription of home ventilation. 1 The results reported to date in COPD patients undergoing home NIV have been variable. Despite the exponential growth in ventilation prescriptions in stable COPD during the last 15 years, the controlled studies of its use carried out so far have yielded variable results in terms of improved survival, dyspnoea, quality of life or impact on arterial blood gases. 2–4 In recent studies, the time to first exacerbation after starting chronic NIV has been used as a surrogate of efficacy. 5 One of the special features of recent studies is the systematic use of high pressure support values and high backup frequency (respiratory rate) on the ventilator. The goal is to try and normalize PaCO2 or to obtain a decrease of at least 20% from baseline values. This is known as high intensity ventilation. Initially, high-intensity NIV in COPD was used in short-term studies with the evaluation of physiological parameters 6,7 but more recently its use has expanded. In fact, the recent European Task Force recommends its use in COPD patients with stable hypercapnia and in those with persistent hypercapnia at 2–4 weeks after a severe exacerbation and advocates the use of high pressure support levels to try to normalize or significantly decrease PaCO2. 8 These pressure levels, however, are higher than the ones used in clinical practice to treat patients with COPD exacerbations and respiratory acidosis, 9 in which inspiratory pressure does not usually reach 18 cm H2O. One of the primary goals of NIV in stable COPD is to unload the respiratory muscles. 8 One of the factors that might explain these differences is the use of different ventilators in exacerbated patients in hospital an -Abstract Truncated-

Comprehensive study of mechanical power in controlled mechanical ventilation: Prevalence of elevated mechanical power and component analysis

Impact of mechanical power on ICU mortality in ventilated critically ill patients: a retrospective study with continuous real-life data

Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts

Mechanical power in AVM-2 versus conventional ventilation modes in a normal lung model: A bench study

Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study

Mechanical power in AVM-2 versus conventional ventilation modes in various ARDS lung models. Bench study

Simplified Mechanical Power Calculation in Patients Receiving Pressure-Regulated, Volume-Targeted Hybrid Modes of Ventilation

Mechanical power and 30-day mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with and without Coronavirus Disease-2019: a hospital registry study

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

[Visualization method of mechanical power exposure intensity and duration in mechanical ventilation patients]

Understanding ventilator-induced lung injury: The role of mechanical power

Association of elastic power in mechanical ventilation with the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study

Twenty-four-hour mechanical power variation rate is associated with mortality among critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective cohort study

Different ventilation intensities among various categories of patients ventilated for reasons other than ARDS––A pooled analysis of 4 observational studies

Effect of Ventilator Settings on Mechanical Power During Simulated Mechanical Ventilation of Patients With ARDS

Influence of age, mechanical power, its fragments and components on the mortality rate in SARS-CoV-2 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation

Perioperative Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Following Cardiac Surgery in Neonates and Young Infants.

Does the Efficacy of High Intensity Ventilation in Stable COPD Depend on the Ventilator Model? A Bench-to-Bedside Study

Characteristics and Risk Factors of Children Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation vs. Non-prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in the PICU: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Intraoperative mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications in low-risk surgical patients: a prospective observational cohort study

Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study