Association of elastic power in mechanical ventilation with the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study

Yongpeng Xie,Jiaxin Shi,Suxia Liu,Xiaobing Chen,Yanli Wang,Xiaomin Li,Yao Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01577-7
IF: 4.981
2024-01-03
European Journal of Medical Research
Abstract:Abstract Background Mechanical power (MP) is the total energy released into the entire respiratory system per minute which mainly comprises three components: elastic static power, Elastic dynamic power and resistive power. However, the energy to overcome resistance to the gas flow is not the key factor in causing lung injury, but the elastic power (EP) which generates the baseline stretch of the lung fibers and overcomes respiratory system elastance may be closely related to the ARDS severity. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether EP is superior to other ventilator variables for predicting the severity of lung injury in ARDS patients. Methods We retrieved patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The retrieved data involved adults (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with ARDS and subjected to invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h. We employed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to investigate the correlation between EP and development of moderate-severe ARDS. Furthermore, we utilized restricted cubic spline models to assess whether there is a linear association between EP and incidence of moderate-severe ARDS. In addition, we employed a stratified linear regression model and likelihood ratio test in subgroups to identify potential modifications and interactions. Results Moderate-severe ARDS occurred in 73.4% (296/403) of the patients analyzed. EP and MP were significantly associated with moderate-severe ARDS (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.28, p < 0.001; and OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.11–1.20, p < 0.001; respectively), but EP showed a higher area-under-curve (95%CI 0.72–0.82, p < 0.001) than plateau pressure, driving pressure, and static lung compliance in predicting ARDS severity. The optimal cutoff value for EP was 14.6 J/min with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 66%. Quartile analysis revealed that the relationship between EP and ARDS severity remained robust and reliable in subgroup analysis. Conclusion EP is a good ventilator variable associated with ARDS severity and can be used for grading ARDS severity. Close monitoring of EP is advised in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Additional experimental trials are needed to investigate whether adjusting ventilator variables according to EP can yield significant improvements in clinical outcomes.
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of elastic power (EP) in predicting the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Specifically, the researchers hypothesized that EP may be more sensitive in capturing the deterioration of respiratory mechanics in ARDS patients than other mechanical ventilation variables, and thus can be used as a new indicator for assessing the severity of ARDS. ### Research Background - **Mechanical Ventilation and Lung Injury**: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a commonly used treatment method for ARDS patients, but improper MV settings may lead to ventilator - induced lung injury (VILI). - **Mechanical Power (MP)**: MP is the total energy released into the entire respiratory system per minute, mainly consisting of three parts: static elastic power, dynamic elastic power, and resistive power. However, the energy to overcome gas flow resistance is not the key factor causing lung injury, while elastic power (EP) may be closely related to the severity of ARDS. - **Research Purpose**: To evaluate whether EP can more effectively predict the severity of ARDS patients than other mechanical ventilation variables. ### Methods - **Data Source**: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC - III) database, involving adult ARDS patients who received mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours. - **Statistical Analysis**: - **Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis**: To explore the relationship between EP and the occurrence of moderate - to - severe ARDS. - **Restricted Cubic Spline Model**: To evaluate the linear relationship between EP and the incidence of moderate - to - severe ARDS. - **Stratified Linear Regression Model and Likelihood Ratio Test**: To identify potential modifiers and interactions in different subgroups. ### Results - **Incidence of Moderate - to - Severe ARDS**: Among 403 patients, 73.4% (296 patients) had moderate - to - severe ARDS. - **Relationship between EP and Moderate - to - Severe ARDS**: - Univariate analysis showed that EP was significantly associated with moderate - to - severe ARDS (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15–1.28, p < 0.001). - Multivariate analysis showed that even after adjusting for confounding factors, EP was still independently associated with moderate - to - severe ARDS (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.13–1.27, p = 0.001). - The optimal cut - off value of EP was 14.6 J/min, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 66%. - Quartile analysis showed that the relationship between EP and the severity of ARDS was still robust in subgroup analysis. ### Conclusions - **Effectiveness of EP**: EP is a good mechanical ventilation variable related to the severity of ARDS and can be used to grade the severity of ARDS. - **Clinical Recommendations**: It is recommended to closely monitor EP in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. - **Future Research Directions**: Further experimental studies are needed to explore whether adjusting mechanical ventilation parameters according to EP can significantly improve clinical outcomes. ### Formulas - **Calculation formula of mechanical power (MP)**: \[ \text{MP} (J/\text{min}) = 0.098\times\text{VT}\times\text{RR}\times(\text{Ppeak}-\frac{1}{2}\Delta P) \] - **Calculation formula of driving pressure ($\Delta P$)**: \[ \Delta P\ (\text{cmH}_2\text{O})=\text{Pplat}-\text{PEEP} \] - **Calculation formula of static lung compliance (Cst)**: \[ \text{Cst}=\frac{\text{VT}}{\Delta P} \]