Abstract:Defensive behavior changes based on threat intensity, proximity, and context of exposure, and learning about danger-predicting stimuli is critical for survival. However, most Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms focus only on freezing behavior, obscuring the contributions of associative and non-associative mechanisms to dynamic defensive responses. To thoroughly investigate defensive ethograms, we subjected male and female adult C57BL/6J mice to a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm that paired footshock with a serial compound stimulus (SCS) consisting of distinct tone and white noise (WN) stimulus periods. To investigate how associative and non-associative mechanisms affect defensive responses, we compared this paired SCS-footshock group with four control groups that were conditioned with either pseudorandom unpaired presentations of SCS and footshock, shock only, or reversed SCS presentations with inverted tone--WN order, with paired or unpaired presentations. On day 2 of conditioning, the paired group exhibited robust freezing during the tone period with switching to explosive jumping and darting behaviors during the WN period. Comparatively, the unpaired and both reverse SCS groups expressed less tone-induced freezing and rarely showed jumping or darting during WN. Following the second day of conditioning, we observed how defensive behavior changed over two extinction sessions. During extinction, the tone-induced freezing decreased in the paired group and mice rapidly shifted from escape jumping during WN to a combination of freezing and darting. The unpaired, unpaired reverse, and shock-only groups displayed defensive tail rattling and darting during the SCS, with minimal freezing and jumping. Interestingly, the paired reverse group did not jump to WN, and tone-evoked freezing was resistant to extinction. These findings demonstrate that non-associative factors promote some defensive responsiveness, but associative factors are required for robust cue-induced freezing and high-intensity flight expression.

Rapid Spatial Learning Controls Instinctive Defensive Behavior in Mice

Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli

Visual stimulus-specific habituation of innate defensive behaviour in mice

Repeated presentation of visual threats drives innate fear habituation and is modulated by environmental and physiological factors

Interpeduncular GABAergic neuron function controls threat processing and innate defensive adaptive learning

Contributions of associative and non-associative learning to the dynamics of defensive ethograms

Mice learn from the predator-attack experience to accelerate flight behavior via optimizing the strategy of environment exploration

Visual spatial location influences selection of instinctive behaviours in mouse

A simple threat-detection strategy in mice

The neural basis of defensive behaviour evolution in Peromyscus mice

Mouse Escape Behaviors and mPFC-BLA Activity Dataset: Understanding Flexible Defensive Strategies Under Threat

Prefrontal control of superior colliculus modulates innate escape behavior following adversity

Development and experience-dependent modulation of the defensive behaviors of mice to visual threats

Corticostriatal control of defense behavior in mice induced by auditory looming cues

Looming stimuli reliably drive innate defensive responses in male rats, but not learned defensive responses

Looming stimuli reliably drive innate, but not learned, defensive responses in rats

Specific retinal neurons regulate context-dependent defensive responses to visual threat

Transformations in prefrontal ensemble activity underlying rapid threat avoidance learning

Predicting Aversive Events And Terminating Fear In The Mouse Anterior Cingulate Cortex During Trace Fear Conditioning

Conditional and unconditional components of aversively motivated freezing, flight and darting in mice

Divergent midbrain circuits orchestrate escape and freezing responses to looming stimuli in mice