Abstract:Defensive behavior changes based on threat intensity, proximity, and context of exposure, and learning about danger-predicting stimuli is critical for survival. However, most Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms focus only on freezing behavior, obscuring the contributions of associative and non-associative mechanisms to dynamic defensive responses. To thoroughly investigate defensive ethograms, we subjected male and female adult C57BL/6J mice to a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm that paired footshock with a serial compound stimulus (SCS) consisting of distinct tone and white noise (WN) stimulus periods. To investigate how associative and non-associative mechanisms affect defensive responses, we compared this paired SCS-footshock group with four control groups that were conditioned with either pseudorandom unpaired presentations of SCS and footshock, shock only, or reversed SCS presentations with inverted tone--WN order, with paired or unpaired presentations. On day 2 of conditioning, the paired group exhibited robust freezing during the tone period with switching to explosive jumping and darting behaviors during the WN period. Comparatively, the unpaired and both reverse SCS groups expressed less tone-induced freezing and rarely showed jumping or darting during WN. Following the second day of conditioning, we observed how defensive behavior changed over two extinction sessions. During extinction, the tone-induced freezing decreased in the paired group and mice rapidly shifted from escape jumping during WN to a combination of freezing and darting. The unpaired, unpaired reverse, and shock-only groups displayed defensive tail rattling and darting during the SCS, with minimal freezing and jumping. Interestingly, the paired reverse group did not jump to WN, and tone-evoked freezing was resistant to extinction. These findings demonstrate that non-associative factors promote some defensive responsiveness, but associative factors are required for robust cue-induced freezing and high-intensity flight expression.

Looming stimuli reliably drive innate, but not learned, defensive responses in rats

Looming stimuli reliably drive innate defensive responses in male rats, but not learned defensive responses

Repeated presentation of visual threats drives innate fear habituation and is modulated by environmental and physiological factors

Contributions of associative and non-associative learning to the dynamics of defensive ethograms

An unescapable looming threat paradigm for assessing anxiety-like responses in rats

An ethologically relevant paradigm to assess defensive response to looming visual contrast stimuli

Interpeduncular GABAergic neuron function controls threat processing and innate defensive adaptive learning

Visual stimulus-specific habituation of innate defensive behaviour in mice

OFF-transient alpha RGCs mediate looming triggered innate defensive response

Specific retinal neurons regulate context-dependent defensive responses to visual threat

Development and experience-dependent modulation of the defensive behaviors of mice to visual threats

Rapid Spatial Learning Controls Instinctive Defensive Behavior in Mice

Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli

A simple threat-detection strategy in mice

Corticostriatal control of defense behavior in mice induced by auditory looming cues

A fear conditioned cue orchestrates a suite of behaviors in rats

Ecological analysis of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats

Divergent midbrain circuits orchestrate escape and freezing responses to looming stimuli in mice

Processing of visually evoked innate fear by a non-canonical thalamic pathway

Conditional and unconditional components of aversively motivated freezing, flight and darting in mice

A top-down insular cortex circuit crucial for non-nociceptive fear learning