Abstract:This paper aims to investigate whether the principle of competitive neutrality of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may be resorted to by international arbitral tribunals in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). This principle posits that the ownership (either public or private) of a given business should not affect its competitive opportunities in the market arena. Although being legally separated from their establishing State, usually independent and autonomous in their self organization, SOEs retain an undeniable vicinity and contact with the public sphere and can and do participate in the exercise of governmental authority at given conditions. This is reflected inter alia by given benefits of SOEs under domestic legal systems such as regulatory immunity from antitrust regulation, fiscal advantages or the exemption from bankruptcy legislation. In ISDS, the mechanism of attribution of conduct of SOEs is generally governed by customary international law, especially as codified by Article 5 of the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA), which relies on the divide between governmental and commercial activities, similar to the nature test applied in relation to the defence of jurisdictional immunity of foreign States before domestic courts. In the international arbitral practice, this dichotomy is traditionally based on the “private contractor” test, which defines as “sovereign” such activities in which a private party may not engage, and, conversely, as “commercial” such activities that a private party may perform. Upon resort to competitive neutrality considerations, the “private contractor” test may be further extended so that the acts that a private competitor in the market arena could have not executed be considered as falling under the exercise of elements of the governmental authority. The principle of competitive neutrality has been elaborated under the aegis of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) through adoption of soft law instruments, such as its ‘Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises’. In addition,the practice of the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system (DSS) may also be instructive with regard to the definition of ‘public body’ under Article 1.1(a)(1) of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement). The Author supports reliance by arbitrators to the principle of competitive neutrality of SOEs in order to strengthen the scope of the rules of attribution codified by ARSIWA, especially under Article 5, so as to foster the accountability of States and SOEs, also in the eyes of their constituencies, and to level the playing field in markets where SOEs and private undertakings compete.

PRINCIPLE OF COMPETITIVE NEUTRALITY FOR STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES TO AN ACCESS TO JUSTICE ON BUSINESS PRACTICES

Monopoly Analysis of a Limited Liability of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)

Competitive Neutrality of Soes in International Investment Law

Research on Competitive Neutrality of SOEs with Special Functions in China

Legal Protection For Creditors To Ensure The Fulfillment Of State-Owned Enterprises (Persero)’S Liabilities In The Indonesian Legal System

Legal Analysis of The Privacy of State-Owned Enterprises

Sino-US trade war, the principle of competitive neutrality and the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises

The logics of political business in state-owned enterprises: the case of Indonesia

The Separated State Property in State-Owned Enterprises

Research on the Impact of "Competitive Neutrality" Rules on Chinese State-owned Enterprises

LAW, CONTESTED SPACE AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF VILLAGE-OWNED STATE ENTERPRISES INSTITUTIONALISM IN INDONESIA

Indonesian Regulations Related to State Losses in Persero State-Owned Enterprises Partly Owned by the State

Achieving Competitive Neutrality Step-By-Step

Consumer Protection in Resale Price Maintenance Practices

Conflict of Law Enforcement by State Institutions over Abuse of Power and Authority: A Case Study of "Former President Director of PT. Pertamina"

Legal Policy in Regulating the Sale of State Houses Class III (Idle State Property) Without Auction to Civil Servants Reviewed from the Perspective of “The Theory of Fairness” From John Rawls

MEANING SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP BASED ON ACT CREATE WORK IN FRAMEWORK PERSPECTIVE LEGAL HERMENEUTICS

Commercial Business Dispute Settlement Through Online Non-Litigation Dispute Settlement in Indonesia

Corporate Governance, Managerial Diversion, and Indonesian State-Owned Enterprises: A Literature Review

Positive Law of Environment and John Ruggie Principles: Between Legal Texts and Norms