PKC Modulation of MinK Current Involves Multiple Phosphorylation Sites

C. Lo,R. Numann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11307.x
IF: 6.499
1999-04-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:elayed-rectifier type K currents are important in determining the shape and repolarization of the cardiac action potential. One component of the cardiac delay rectifier is termed IKs, and this has recently been suggested to be composed of two molecular entities: KvLQT1 and minK. 1 Mutations have been found in the genes for both of these clones that are responsible for the most common forms of inherited long QT syndrome in man. IKs is modulated in the heart by β-adrenergic receptors through a cAMP pathway and by α-adrenergic receptors through the protein kinase C (PKC) pathway. PKC activation stimulates IKs in guinea pig myocytes, but decreases IKs in mouse myocytes. When minK message is injected into Xenopus oocytes it coassembles with endogenous Xenopus KvLQT1 1 to produce a current with properties very similar to IKs. Mouse and rat minK currents expressed this way are decreased by PKC activation, whereas guinea pig minK current is activated by PKC. In mouse and rat minK cDNA there is a putative PKC phosphorylation site at serine 102. Amino acid sequence comparison reveals that guinea pig minK protein has an asparagine residue at the same position. Mutating the guinea pig asparagine into serine creates a guinea pig minK current that is down-regulated by PKC. Conversely mutating the mouse serine 102 and neighboring residues produces a mutant mouse minK current that is up-regulated by PKC. These results suggest that position 102 in minK protein is critical in determining the effect of PKC. Human minK has a serine residue at position 102. It would be predicted that PKC would down-regulate the associated current. However, we found that PKC activation can elicit a complex biphasic effect, with both upand down-regulation, on human minK current. Here we investigate the PKC modulation of human minK current in more detail, including mutagenesis of position 102. We speculate that multiple phosphorylation sites are required to account for the complex action of PKC on the minK-KvLQT1 channel.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?