Abstract:Payment for ecosystem services (PES) is a market-based policy approach intended to foster land use practices, such as forest conservation or restoration, that protect and improve the benefits from healthy, functioning ecosystems. While PES programs are used globally, they are an especially prominent environmental policy tool in Latin America, where the vast majority are payment for hydrological services (PHS) programs, which incentivize the conservation and restoration of ecosystems associated with water production and clean water for clearly defined water users. As a market mechanism, PHS approaches involve a transactional relationship between upstream and downstream water users who are connected by a shared watershed. While existing literature has highlighted the important role of non-state actors in natural resource management and program effectiveness, few studies have explored the role of stakeholder participation in the context of PHS programs. Building on the collaborative learning approach and the Trinity of Voice framework, we sought to understand how and to what extent PHS program stakeholders are engaged in PHS design, implementation, and evaluation. In this paper we explored (1) the modes of stakeholder engagement in PHS programs that program administrators use, and (2) the degree to which different modes of stakeholder participation allow PHS stakeholders to have decision power with which to influence PHS policy design and expected outcomes. To better understand the role of stakeholder participation, and the different ways participation occurs, we used a comparative multiple-case study analysis of three PHS program administration types (government, non-profit, and a mixed public–private organization) in Mexico and Colombia that have incorporated stakeholder engagement to achieve ecological and social goals. Our analysis draws on institutional interviews to investigate the modes of stakeholder engagement and understand the degree of decision space that is shared with other PHS stakeholders. Across all cases, we found that the trust between key actors and institutions is an essential but underappreciated aspect of successful collaboration within PHS initiatives. We conclude with recommendations for ways in which program administrators and governmental agencies can better understand and facilitate the development of trust in PHS design and implementation, and natural resources management more broadly.

Benefit Distribution and Equity in Ecuador's Socio Bosque Program

Incentives for biodiversity conservation under asymmetric land ownership

The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar

Better RED than dead: paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia

Enhancing Livelihood Resilience Through Hybrid Ecological Compensation: Evidence from Potatso National Park, China

Revealing Pathways from Payments for Ecosystem Services to Socioeconomic Outcomes

Who benefits from payments for ecosystem services? Policy lessons from a forest carbon sink program in China

Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery

Socio-ecological costs of Amazon nut and timber production at community household forests in the Bolivian Amazon

Fair payments for effective environmental conservation

Socio-economic and environmental trade-offs in Amazonian protected areas and Indigenous territories revealed by assessing competing land uses

The role of funding in the performance of Latin America's protected areas

Payment for ecosystem services and motivational crowding: Experimental insights regarding the integration of plural values via non-monetary incentives

Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands

Socio-Economic Analysis in the Design of An Afforestation and Desertification Control Project

Developing markets for forest environmental services: an opportunity for promoting equity while securing efficiency?

Uncovering Stakeholder Participation in Payment for Hydrological Services (PHS) Program Decision Making in Mexico and Colombia

How Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Land Tenure? Theory and Evidence from China

Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China

Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management

Integrated assessment of a payment for ecosystem services program in China from the effectiveness, efficiency and equity perspective