Abstract:Background A better understanding of the perceptions of family members in making surrogate decisions for loved ones during intensive care is needed to inform the development of targeted supportive interventions. Objective To examine and synthesize qualitative data on family members' perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit. Design We conducted a systematic review and qualitative data synthesis. Eligible studies contained family members' quotes about surrogate decision-making experiences and perceptions in adult intensive care units, published in English or Chinese, in a peer-reviewed journal up to February 2022. Data sources included Embase, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and VIP Journal. Methods The searches yielded 5974 identified articles, of which 23 studies were included. At least two different reviewers independently assessed the study quality and extracted data into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. A thematic synthesis was performed by classifying all text units into one of the broad themes and subsequently analyzed to inductively develop the first-, second-, and third-order themes. Six family members with experience in intensive care unit surrogate decision-making contributed to the analysis. Results The qualitative data synthesis resulted in five major themes. The following key new insights into family members' perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit were obtained: in individual systems, family members suffered from emotional distress and psychological stress; different cognitive styles emerged; some family members reshaped a new order of life in the disruption; in family systems, the family as a whole was closely connected with each other; and in medical systems families perceived asymmetry in relationships with clinicians, many factors influencing trust, the necessity for role-specific mediators and issues with operations and environments not being sufficiently humanized. Conclusion This qualitative synthesis showed that individuals' emotions and cognition underwent complex processes during surrogate decision-making. The family as a whole, with disparate functional states, also faced different processes and outcomes under the crisis situation. At a broader level, the decision-making process reflected society's perceptions of the medical system. Future studies should use these insights to further explore and optimize the many aspects of surrogate decision support measures for families of critically ill patients and include the measurement of outcomes after interventions at multiple layers of the individual, family, and medical systems.Registration number: The protocol was prospectively published on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)—CRD42022316687. Tweetable abstract Families of critically ill patients undergo a complex interactional process within the individual, family, and medical systems during surrogate decision-making.

Surrogate decision‐makers from historically marginalized populations have lower levels of preparedness for care planning

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

Family members' perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: A systematic review

How do surrogates make treatment decisions for patients with dementia: An experimental survey study

The Stresses of Surrogate Decision-Making: Contributing Factors and Clinicians' Role in Mitigation

The Surrogate Decision Making Participation Experience of Severe Acute Pancreatitis Patient in ICU: A Phenomenological Research in China

The experience of surrogate decision‐making and deciphering critically ill patient values: A qualitative study

Measures of Patient and Surrogate Preparedness for End-of-Life Decision-Making

Previous Experience in Medical Decision Making and Advance Care Planning Conversations: Findings From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

Cross-sectional survey of surrogate decision-making in Japanese medical practice

Surrogate Decision-Making After Stroke in a Community Setting: The OASIS Project

Which primary care resident is more likely to initiate the discussion of designating a healthcare proxy?

Abstract WMP55: Advance Care Planning and Decision Regret Among Stroke Surrogate Decision Makers

Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles

Assessment of Surrogates’ Knowledge of Patients’ Treatment Goals and Confidence in Their Ability to Make Surrogate Treatment Decisions

Patient Engagement With Early Stage Advance Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework

Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France

Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel

Home Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients at Risk for Becoming Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates

Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury