Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity

State Ownership and Corporate Innovation Efficiency

Privatization of Soes and Its Innovation Performance: A Reexamination

Innovation output and state ownership: empirical evidence from China’s listed firms

The impact of privatization of state-owned enterprises on innovation in China: A tale of privatization degree

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

R&D subsidies, innovation and technological progress: An empirical study of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises based on comparison

Comparison of the Profile of Portuguese Companies That Receive Public Support for Innovation: National Support vs. European Support

The effects of state ownership on innovation: evidence from the state-owned enterprises reform in China

Does Private Equity Investment Spur Innovation? Evidence from Europe

The Patterns of Patents in China

Does the relationship between innovation and competition vary across industries? Comparison of public and private research enterprises

Privatization and Innovation: Productivity, New Products, and Patents in China

Research on the impact of mixed ownership reform on innovation of state-owned enterprises: Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises

Open innovation in Russian state-owned enterprises

Dynamic impact of mixed-ownership reform on enterprise innovation with different property rights

Has EU accession boosted patents performance in the EU-13? -- A critical evaluation using causal impact analysis with Bayesian structural time-series models

Work Experience of Private Entrepreneurs in SOEs and Enterprise Innovation Investment: Evidence from China

The Corporate Innovation in Europe

Stock Liquidity and Enterprise Innovation: New Evidence from China

Open innovation and network dynamics. An analysis of openness of co-patenting collaborations in Florence, Italy