The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer: a systematic review

Chi-Wen Chang,Pei-Fan Mu,Shiann-Tarng Jou,Tai-Ting Wong,Yu-Chih Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-60

Abstract:Background: Fatigue is one of the most distressing and prevalent symptoms reported by paediatric oncology patients. With the increase in cancer survival rate, how to control children's cancer-related fatigue during treatments or the coexisting period with the disease to further increase their quality of life has become the focus of medical teams who provide care to children with cancer. Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesise the best available evidence concerning the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer. Search strategy: The search strategy aimed to find studies published between 1960 and 2010, in either the English or Chinese languages. Reference lists of studies that met the inclusion criteria were also searched for additional studies. Types of studies: This review included randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that examined the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer. Types of participants: Children and adolescents aged between one to 18 years old, with cancer either during or after the chemotherapy. The types of cancer included were acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia, lymphoma and solid tumours. Types of interventions: Non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer including: activity enhancement (exercise, physical activity), psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioural therapy, stress management, relaxation, nutrition consultation, massage and educational interventions. The intervention descriptions included the length, frequency, setting and intervention providers. Types of outcome measures: The outcome measures considered fatigue scores assessment. Types of setting: The review considered studies conducted either in a hospital or a community setting. Data collection and synthesis: The data were extracted and synthesised using the standardised data extraction tool and synthesis function offered by the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument. Results: The review included six studies - five English-language papers and one Chinese-language paper. Meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant impact on the effectiveness of exercise interventions in reducing overall fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer. Exercise interventions did lead to a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.01) in general fatigue (i.e. tiredness, physical weakness) (effect size = -0.76; 95% Confidence Interval -1.35 to -0.17). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review show that exercise interventions can effectively reduce the level of general fatigue of children aged six to 18 years. No strong conclusions can be made for the use of massage therapy or health education measures, as there was only one article for each of these interventions. Implications for practice: The review provides an evidenced-based guide to future priorities for clinical practice. Exercise intervention could reduce the level of general fatigue of children aged six to 18 years. In particular, exercise interventions for fatigue are feasible and safe. Implications for research: There is still a lack of rigorous research on this specific topic. Further research requires more rigorous study design and reporting of methodological issues, such as randomised controlled trials using concealment of allocation. Other non-pharmacological interventions for this problem should also be examined, including cognitive behavioural therapy, stress management, relaxation, support groups and massage therapy.