Abstract:PurposeHypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer is gaining clinical acceptance given its potential increase in therapeutic ratio and evidence for noninferiority and lack of added late toxicities compared to conventional fractionation. However, concerns have been raised that smaller number of fractions might lead to larger dosimetric influence by interfractional motion. We aim to compare the effect of these variations on hypofractionated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for localized prostate cancer.MethodsWeekly CT images were acquired for 6 patients participating in a randomized clinical trial. PBS plans featuring bilateral (BL) and a combination of lateral and anterior-oblique beams (AOL), and VMAT plans were created. All patients were treated to a conventional 79.2Gy total dose in 44 fractions. For this study, hypofractionated dose to the prostate gland was 51.6Gy in 12 fractions or 36.25Gy in 5 fractions, and 32.8, and 23.1Gy to proximal seminal vesicles, respectively. Patients were simulated with endorectal balloons to aid gland immobilization. Three fiducial markers were implanted for setup guidance. All plans were recomputed on the weekly CT images after aligning with the simulation CT. The entire set of 9 CT images was used for dose recalculation for 12-fraction and only 5 used for the 5-fraction case. Adaptive range adjustments were applied to anterior-oblique beams assuming clinical availability of invivo range verification. Fractional doses were summed using deformable dose accumulation to approximate the delivered dose. Biologically equivalent dose to 2Gy(EQD2) was calculated assuming / of 1.5Gy for prostate and 3Gy for bladder and rectum.ResultsThe median delivered prostate D-98 was 0.13/0.14/0.13Gy(EQD2) smaller than planned for PBS-BL, 0.13/0.27/0.17Gy(EQD2) for PBS-AOL and 0.59/0.66/0.59Gy(EQD2) for VMAT, for 44/12/5 fractions, respectively. The largest D-98 reduction was 1.5 and 3.5Gy(EQD2) for CTV1 and CTV2, respectively. Target dose degradation was comparable for all fractionation schemes within each modality. The maximum increase in rectum D-2 was 0.98Gy(EQD2) for a 5-fraction PBS case.ConclusionsThe robustness of PBS and VMAT were comparable for all patients for the studied fractionations. The delivered target dose generally remained within clinical tolerance and the deviations were relatively minor for both fractionation schemes. The delivered OAR dose stayed in compliance with the RTOG hypofractionation constraints for all cases.

Dosimetric Benefits of Midposition Compared With Internal Target Volume Strategy for Esophageal Cancer Radiation Therapy

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Dosimetric comparison of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for distal esophageal cancer

Computed Tomography-Based Evaluation of Volume and Position Changes of the Target Region and Organs at Risk During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Pilot Study

A Four-dimensional Computed Tomography Generated Internal Target Volume Approach to Paediatric High Risk Neuroblastoma to Reduce Organ at Risk and Normal Tissue Irradiation

Optimising PTV margins in oesophageal cancer radiotherapy: A modern radiotherapy planning, treatment delivery and verification approach – A single institutional analysis

Detecting the Variations of the Spatial Position and Overlap Ratio for Primary Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Target During Radiation Therapy Based on Repeated 4-Dimensional Ct Scans

EP-1918: Dosimetric benefits of mid-position approach compared with internal target volume for esophageal RT

Impact of Using Different Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Data Sets to Design Proton Treatment Plans for Distal Esophageal Cancer.

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Radial and Longitudinal Margins for Tomotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

Comparison of the Planning Target Volume Based on Three-Dimensional Ct and Four-Dimensional Ct Images of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

Geometrical Evaluation of 3Dct-Based and Pet/4dct-Based Target Volumes in the Definition of Radiation Treatment Planning in Primary Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer

Comparative study of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography in treatment of upper-thoracic, middle-thoracic, and lower-thoracic esophageal cancers

optimal dosimetry study of metal stent with three dimensional conformal and intensity modulation radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

Dosimetric comparison of four-dimensional computed tomography based internal target volume against variations in respiratory motion during treatment between volumetric modulated arc therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

An Analysis of Respiration-Induced Target Displacement on Four-Dimensional Ct and Its Implications for Gastric Carcinoma Radiotherapy.

Dosimetric effect of beam arrangement for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

A Comparison of Planning Target Volume Definition by the Patient-Specific Margins and the Generic Margins for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Different functional lung-sparing strategies and radiotherapy techniques for patients with esophageal cancer

A dosimetery study on different irradiation technique for esophageal carcinoma by 3 dimensional treatment planning system(3D-TPS)