Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the clear aligners with the traditional fixed appliances in the treatment of premolars extraction complex cases using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Material and methods: A single-centre, 2-parallel groups RCT with two arms. Forty severe crowding patients (14 males, 26 females; mean age: 21.40±2.42) who required four first premolars extraction were included and randomly allocated into two treatment groups: clear aligners therapy group (CAT), and fixed appliances therapy group (FAT). Cases complexities were measured on pre-treatment records using the Discrepancy index (DI). Post-treatment records were evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Two sample t-tests and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for significant differences between the two groups. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.006 using Bonferroni's correction. Results: For the DI, the mean scores were 32.25 (± 4.33) in the CAT group and 33 (± 7.92) in the FAT group. In the CAT group, the total OGS score ranged between 6-33 points with an average of 17.50(± 7.41), whereas the total score in the FAT group went between 4-30 points with an average of 12.89 (± 6.31) with no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.05). When comparison of the successful cases between the two groups was made, 11 cases received passing scores, and 9 cases received failing scores in the CAT group. Whereas in the FAT group, 17 cases received passing scores, and 3 received a failing score. No statistically significant differences were found in the passing rates between of the CAT and FAT groups (P = 0.421). Conclusions: According to the ABO-OGS total scores, there was no significant difference between the clear aligners and fixed appliances in the treatment of class I severe crowding cases with first premolars extraction in young adults. There were no differences between the two techniques in the OGS components scores except for the occlusal contacts, which were significantly better with the fixed appliances. When comparing the number of successful and failed cases between the two groups, no significant differences were noted, with the fixed appliances having a 30% higher success rate than the clear aligners, which must be considered clinically when choosing between these two techniques in the complex orthodontic cases treatment.

Invisible appliance and fixed appliance in the extraction of four firstpremolars crowded in the application and clinical analysis

Comparison of fixed braces and clear braces for malocclusion treatment

Three‐Dimensional Comparative Analysis of Root Parallelism in First Premolar Extraction Cases: Clear Aligner Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliance

[Effect of invisible appliance without bracket and self-locking bracket appliance on periodontal and subgingival flora in patients with periodontitis]

Comparative study of two different fixed appliances on the changes in GST-ALP level during distal movement of canines

The application of a new clear removable appliance with an occlusal splint in early anterior crossbite

Study of Fixed Appliance on Periodontal Status of Patients

[A retrospective study on incisor root resorption in patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance and straight wire appliance]

A patient with bimaxillary protrusion was treated by the extraction of four premolars and four compromised first molars: a case report

Non-extraction Treatment with Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study

Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial

A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies

[Preliminary clinical application of Chinese-made invisible orthodontic technique]

[Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study].

Comparison of Achieved and Predicted Crown Movement in Adults after 4 First Premolar Extraction Treatment with Invisalign

Orthodontic Treatment Based on Wearable Mirror-Type Oral Prosthetic Tongue Flap without Bracket Correction

Comparison of Treatment Results Between Angle Class III Subgroup Patients Treated by Maxillary Protraction with Fixed Appliance and Fixed Appliance Only

Treatment Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Correcting Complicated and Severe Malocclusion Cases Compared to Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review

Craniofacial Hard and Soft Tissue Changes after Extraction Treatment Using Damon Ⅲ Appliance

The evolution of orthodontic appliances and techniques