Abstract:Past theories and studies have already proved the morality of guilt emotions, and have shown that guilt emotions could promote and maintain social fairness in interpersonal interactions and relationships. In a two-party dictator game, guilty individuals often allocate more resources to their victims, and leave themselves with fewer resources, because the bias distribution of the limited resources means a compensatory behavior to the victims afterwards. Obviously, the biased outcome of distribution actually achieves fairness at the level of a two-person relationship. However, in a multi-party dictator game, if guilty individuals intend to compensate their particular victims, their biased allocation behavior will harm the interests of the innocent third parties. Because the more given to victims from the limited resources as a compensatory behavior, the less resources remain for the innocent third parties. At a broader level of a three-person relationship, guilt emotion results in an unfair outcome, even though the fairness between the victim and the guilty allocator seems to be guaranteed.In the current study, two experiments were designed accordingly to test the complicated and multidimensional effects of guilt on outcomes of allocation in different situations above. In Experiment 1, participants were arranged to report their allocation decisions after their reading a short story. While in Experiment 2, participants should take part in a dictator game and decide how to distribute limited resources after their finishing a cooperative task. In both experiments, participants were randomly assigned to either a two-party group or a three-party group, and they were randomly assigned to either a guilt group or a control group. The guilt emotion was induced by the short story in Experiment 1 and was induced by the cooperative task in Experiment 2. Results in both two experiments provided evidence that (1) in a two-party situation, the guilty distributors compensate their victims by giving them more resources and keeping fewer resources for themselves, while (2) in a three-party situation, regardless of whether the guilty distributors needs to allocate some resources to themselves, the guilty distributors compensate their victims by taking advantage of the innocent third parties. These results show the implication of the complicated and multidimensional effects of guilt on social fairness, which may be neglected in previous researches.

A Sorrow Shared Is a Sorrow Halved: Moral Judgments of Harm to Single versus Multiple Victims

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Is It Fair to Kill One to Save Five? How Just World Beliefs Shape Sacrificial Moral Decision-making

Moral barrier to compassion: How perceived badness of sufferers dampens observers' compassionate responses

The elusive power of the individual victim: Failure to find a difference in the effectiveness of charitable appeals focused on one compared to many victims

Reaping What They Sow? Victim-Offender Overlap Perceptions and Victim Blaming Attitudes

Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt

Effects of Group Size and Procedural Influence on Consensual Judgments of Quantity: the Examples of Damage Awards and Mock Civil Juries.

Victims of misfortune may not “deserve” help: A possible factor in victim-devaluation

Empathy for the pain of others: Sensitivity to the individual, not to the collective

The Scope-Severity Paradox

Harming kin to save strangers: further evidence for abnormally utilitarian moral judgments after ventromedial prefrontal damage

Moderate similarity leads to empathic concern, but high similarity can also induce personal distress towards others' pain

Group-based reputational incentives can blunt sensitivity to societal harms and benefits.

Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis✩

Victim identifiability, number of victims, and unit asking in charitable giving

When Do Observers Deprioritize Due Process for the Perpetrator and Prioritize Safety for the Victim in Response to Information-Poor Allegations of Harm?

The Effect Of Guilt On Fairness In Game Situations

Family favouring effects across intent and outcome-based moral judgements and decisions

Having pity on our victims to save ourselves: Compassion reduces self-critical emotions and self-blame about past harmful behavior among those who highly identify with their past self

Dying for help: How mortality salience impacts perceptions of victims