Abstract:In recent years there has been a drive to embed sustainable development into the Higher Education design curriculum. Within the UK this has been encouraged institutionally through the Engineering Council’s UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence and the Royal Academy of Engineering’s visiting professor scheme. Despite these efforts sustainable development does not appear to have been fully embedded into the design curriculum. Where sustainable development has been introduced it has often been viewed in isolation from the design process, as an add-on, distraction or introduced toward the end of the student’s academic career. Progress is evident with educational approaches involving problem based learning (PBL) and peer assisted learning (PAL) yielding measurable benefits. However, the main focus of activity has been toward the more quantitative aspects of sustainability namely environmental and economic impacts whilst the less tangible qualitative and social factors are ignored. More recently the concept of “social usefulness” has emerged as a means for engaging design engineering students with these aspects of sustainability. To encourage student engagement with the broader elements of sustainable development, particularly in the social sphere, a short course was developed from ongoing research and experience gained from previous programmes. Building upon previous work the compulsory course ran for the first week of the academic year with students involved in no other academic activities. Students were drawn from first and second year cohorts of Design Engineering and placed in small mixed groups with no account taken for prior academic performance. The methodology utilised design analysis as the backbone and each group issued with a different consumer product. Verbal briefs were provided at key stages and although initially limited in detail, the scope and duration expanded as the course progressed. Within this context groups analysed the product from a broad sustainability perspective. This analysis included social usefulness, the functional service provided to the consumer and wider community, the product-service mix and material utilisation. Didactic elements were restricted to short micro-seminars emphasising the underlying concepts with learning delivered through PBL, PAL and student presentations. Learning was reinforced through post presentation discussion sessions and reflective learning accounts which students submitted at pre-defined intervals. Analysis of the presentations and reflective accounts indicated development in the students understanding of sustainability and the relevance to engineering and product design. Students identified the difference between aspirational and inspirational products, how social usefulness can be linked to service and how changes to the product-service mix can improve material utilisation. The use of PBL and PAL encouraged students to develop their own strategies for problem solving and learning better equipping them with the skills required for study within HE and beyond into lifelong learning and continuous professional development. An interesting observation was made in that emotional attachment by the students to the products upon which the activity was based inhibited the students’ ability to consider them objectively. This was unexpected and considered an important learning observation leading the research team to consider adapting the phenomena to both existing and proposed learning programmes.

Using Modified Mastery Learning to Teach Sustainability and Life-Cycle Principles as Part of Modeling and Design

Increasing Sustainability Literacy for Environmental Design Students: A Transdisciplinary Learning Practice

Teaching Sustainability Using an Active Learning Constructivist Approach: Discipline-Specific Case Studies in Higher Education

Teaching mathematical modeling for sustainability: Enhancing interdisciplinary skills in students

Developing key competencies in sustainability through project-based learning in graduate sustainability programs

Case-based flipped classroom approach to teach sustainable infrastructure and decision-making

Sustainable Design Masters: Increasing the Sustainability Literacy of Designers

Developing and Teaching A Multidisciplinary Course in Systems Thinking for Sustainability: Lessons Learned Through Two Iterations

Exploring Sustainability Instruction Methods in Engineering Thermodynamics Courses: Insights from Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

Project-Based Approach in a First-Year Engineering Course to Promote Project Management and Sustainability

Learning by sustainable living to improve sustainability literacy

Using research methods courses to teach students about sustainable development – a three-phase model for a transformative learning experience

Introduction to systems engineering and sustainability PART I: Student-centred learning for chemical and biological engineers

Promoting Sustainability in University Classrooms Using a STEM Project with Mathematical Modeling

Life Cycle Assessment in Higher Education: Design and Implementation of a Teaching Sequence Activity

A Critical Survey of Environmental Content in United States Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curricula

Integrating Social Factors Through Design Analysis

Integration of sustainability in regular courses: experiences in industrial design engineering

Macrosystems EDDIE teaching modules significantly increase ecology students' proficiency and confidence working with ecosystem models and use of systems thinking

Design-based learning for a sustainable future: student outcomes resulting from a biomimicry curriculum in an evolution course

Embedding Sustainability Principles into Engineering Education