Introduction to systems engineering and sustainability PART I: Student-centred learning for chemical and biological engineers

U. Tuzun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.004

IF: 3.2

2020-04-01

Education for Chemical Engineers

Abstract:<p>Student-Centred Active Learning of Systems Engineering and Sustainability requires challenging metacognitive integration of high-level evaluation skills combined with discipline-based core knowledge. This two-part series aims to demonstrate the basic principles, methodology and specific examples of active learning with formative assessment implemented to achieve improved student academic performance. In this part I of the two-part series, firstly, a detailed description is introduced of the cognitive learning methodology which makes use of student-centered recognition, analysis and synthesis for decision-making when there is no entirely right or wrong decision. The concept of "decision situation" is described which combines several surrounding and contingency elements to arrive at a demonstration of the <strong>holistic decision-making</strong> through <strong>systems analysis</strong>. A Holistic thinking approach is further developed using a systems learning methodology that combines normative with descriptive analyses to arrive at a cognitive mode model of <strong>judgement and choice</strong>. Sustainability modelling using the three-gateway systems approach is introduced and compared with the multi-layered view of chemical and biochemical engineering education and research; see <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#bib0055">Gani et al. (2020)</a>. Holistic thinking strategy is applied most recently to integrating, backcasting and eco-design for the circular economy (CE); see <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#bib0095">Mendoza et al. (2017)</a>. A student-centred learning approach is advocated that makes use of these principles and enables the systematic embedding of sustainability modeling in industrial and economic activities whose success rely substantively on decision-making. Finally, the relative importance is evaluated using classroom data available with specific engineering topics of the didactic "rule-based" methods of knowledge transfer in contrast with the experiential accumulation of practical information amassed through social interactions in a <strong>co-operative learning environment</strong> that relies on sustained improvement through active communication and feedback between the teacher/instructor and the student/learner; see Stephan et al. (2017) and Shallcross and Alpay (2018).</p>

education, scientific disciplines,engineering, chemical