Abstract:Background Dental implants made of zirconia (ZrO2) are a potential alternative for titanium implants in dentistry because of their good biocompatibility, mechanical properties and excellent aesthetic results. However, solid long‐term scientific data to prove clinical success of ZrO2 implants are scarce. Aim The aim of this study was to describe and to examine the clinical performance of custom‐made two‐piece ZrO2 implants, to identify possible influencing factors: a) manipulation of the implant after placement and b) the occlusal scheme on the survival rate, and to evaluate the performance of the implant‐supported crown. This follow‐up study collected and examined the 5‐year data to answer the main question: What are the survival and the success rates of custom‐made ZrO2 implants in the maxillary premolar region after 5 years? Material and Methods Of the 31 included patients in this prospective 5‐year follow‐up single‐arm clinical trial, 30 received a custom‐made ZrO2 implant to replace a missing single maxillary premolar, which was subsequently restored with a lithium disilicate crown. Parameters regarding clinical performance, marginal bone‐level (MBL) changes, and patient‐related outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed preoperatively, at the baseline, as well as 1 and 5 years after crown placement. Chances of survival and success of the implant were calculated and displayed using Kaplan–Meier statistics. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed with stratification based on the variables "manipulation of the implant prior to impression taking" and "occlusal scheme" and compared using log‐rank tests. Bone‐level moderation in time was compared using a paired samples t‐test. Patient's expectations and satisfaction after 5 years were compared as a measure of fulfilled expectations, using a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Performance of the implant‐supported crowns was evaluated using validated criteria. Results Survival and success probabilities after 5 years were, respectively, 75.8% (95% CI [60.0%; 91.0%]) and 71.0% (95% CI [54.0%; 88.0%]) for the custom‐made ZV3 implants. No significant differences in survival rate were found after stratification on "manipulation of the implant" and on "occlusal scheme." Mean bone‐level alteration between baseline and the first follow‐up was +0.06 mm (95% CI [−0.23 mm; 0.12 mm]; SD = 0.42 mm) and between baseline and the second follow‐up was +0.04 mm (95% CI [−0.35 mm; 0.26 mm]; SD = 0.54 mm). Patients' satisfaction for patients with implants still in function after 5 years was 91.7% (IQR = [90.5%–97.3%]), indicating satisfaction with the treatment. Pooled satisfaction in patients with successful implants after 5 years was significantly higher than patients' expressed expectations before treatment. None of the crowns failed, and no interventions were required. Conclusion and Clinical Implications Survival rate of these particular ZV3 implants in our study was lower than expected and clinically not acceptable. Hence, ZV3 implant placement as applied in this study cannot be recommended for clinical practice. Further research on the different appearances of mechanical failure in ZrO2 implants would be highly recommended before a larger prospective randomized clinical trial is conducted to evaluate treatment with custom‐made ZrO2 dental implants.

Stock Versus CAD/CAM Customized Zirconia Implant Abutments - Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Implant‐supported single all‐ceramic crowns made from prefabricated (stock) or individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: A 5 year randomized clinical trial

Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Morphology on the Outcomes of Implant Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical performance of implant crowns with customized zirconia abutments: A prospective cohort study with a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up

13-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study on zirconia and titanium abutments

Findings of a Four-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two-Piece and One-Piece Zirconia Abutments Supporting Single Prosthetic Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Region

Five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing single-tooth implant-supported restoration with either zirconia or titanium abutments

A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region

Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Abutment for Implant- Supported Single-Tooth Restoration in Anterior Region

[Effect of Customized Zirconia Abutment on Peri-Implant Tissue: a One-Year Prospective Study].

Effect of different prosthetic abutments on peri-implant soft tissue. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical and immunological evaluation of peri-implant tissues around ultra-polished and conventionally-polished zirconia abutments. A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial

Experimental custom-made zirconia abutments for narrow implants in esthetically demanding regions: a 5-year follow-up

Metal‐Free Custom‐Made Zirconia Implants—A Prospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Single‐Arm Clinical Trial

Influence of CAD/CAM Abutment Heights on the Biomechanical Behavior of Zirconia Single Crowns

Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown]

Cross-sectional analysis comparing prefabricated titanium to individualized hybrid zirconia abutments for cemented zirconia based fixed dental prostheses: a critical concept assessment

A randomized clinical trial on zirconia versus titanium implants in maxillary single tooth replacement