MECHANISMS OF SPREADING FACTOR ACTION
O. Hechter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1950.tb54001.x
IF: 6.499
1950-05-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:The term “spreading factor” (S.F.) has been applied to a diverse group of substances, widely distributed in nature, which have in common the single property of increasing the spread of intradermally injected indicators relative to a control solution administered in equivalent volume. While one group of S.F.’s, i.e., the hyaluronidases, have been shown to promote spreading in tissues other than dermis and in the skin of dead animals (cf. the review of Duran-Reynals‘), it is not knownwhether the non-hyaluronidase S.F.’s are likewise active under those circumstances. The view of Chain and Duthrie2 that the hyaluronidases, whether derived from testes, bacteria, or venoms, produce their characteristic spreading response by depolymerizing a hyaluronic acid gel, believed to be a component of the dermal barrier which restrains the diffusion of fluids injected into skin, is now generally accepted. Another group of spreading agents-azoprot e i n ~ , ~ 3 ascorbic acid, and related reducing agents6-is likewise believed to act via depolymerization of dermal hyaluronate, since these substances reduce the viscosity of hyaluronic acid solutions.4’ 6 , There remains, however, a large and diverse group of agents which, while possessing clear spreading activity in ziii~o, do not appear to act directly upon the hyaluronate system in skin.’ This group of S.F.’s, which may be termed “hyaluronateinactive,” have been little investigated. Strictly speaking, this group consists of only a few spreading agents which actually have been tested and shown not to affect hyaluronate in vitro; these are preparations obtained from bacteria, pig skin, and hirudin.? Tentatively included in the “hyaluronate-inactive” group, although not tested iiz edtio, are materials such as kallikrein,8, lecithins,’ 3 lo peptones,l* lo extracts from various organs in certain speciesI1* fractions of human urine,13 certain factors present in venoms’ l 4 and bacteria,’d’ and relatively simple chemicals such as glycerol,’ triacetin,’ arsenious oxide,? sodium diazobenzene sulfonate? and ~rethane.’~ It should be pointed out that a comparative study of i ~ z vivo and in vitro activity is not necessarily crucial i n elucidating the action of a S.F. At the present time, a variety of preparations, usually obtained from human umbilical cords, exhibiting varying viscosities and different properties, and contaminated to a greater or lesser degree, are all called hyaluronic acid because they give viscous solutions and contain acetyl glucosamine and glucuronic acid.Ix Indeed, the question has even been raised whether there may not be a family of hyaluronic acids, differing greatly in particle size, rather than a single homogenous polysaccharide, which is partially destroyed or depolymerized during isolation.18 The status of our information concerning dermal hyaluronate is thus severely limited, even if we do not consider the not unreasonable possibility that dermal hyaluronate is bound to protein or