937 Barriers, Misconceptions and the Lack of Physicians' Recommendation Account for Poor Screening Uptake in Colorectal Compared With Cervical Cancer: Findings of a National Population Representative Survey

Reuben K. Wong,Mee Lian Wong,Yiong H. Chan,Zhu Feng,Chun Tao Wai,Khay Guan Yeoh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(14)60579-5
IF: 29.4
2014-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:s , 2440 (62%) males, consented to participate in this study.Of these, 2166 patients who had 1st-and 2nd-TCS, with removal of all adenomatous polyps were randomly assigned into two groups (1087 to two-exam and 1079 to one-exam group).The results of the noninferiority test were significant (p=0.017 in per-protocol, p=0.001 in intention-to-treat).In per-protocol analysis (701 in two-exam vs 763 in one-exam group), the IL incidences of two groups were similar (1.7% vs 2.1%).The percentage of patients with adenomas in twoexam was 50.1%, versus 37.7% in one-exam group.Among all ILs, there were 6 LGD ≥10mm, 5 HGD and 1 invasive cancer in two-exam, 9 LGD ≥10mm and 8 HGD in oneexam group, respectively.Morphologically, NP-CRNs were dominant (62%, 18/29) and most of them were classified into laterally spreading tumor non-granular (LST-NG) type; (83%, 15/18).Moreover, 7 out of 15 ILs classified into LST-NG were histologically diagnosed as HGD.Conclusions: Colonoscopy performed 3 years after endoscopic removal of all adenomatous polyps detected clinically important lesions as effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both 1 and 3 years, being such results in accordance with those of the NPS.Two complete colonoscopies before randomization provided us a lower incidence of ILs compared with NPS data (3.3%).Further investigation will be necessary to evaluate whether the detection of NP-CRNs, especially LST-NG type determines a change in the prevention of colorectal cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?