Dosimetric validation for prospective clinical trial on GRID collimator‐based spatially fractionated radiation therapy: Dose metrics consistency and heterogeneous pattern reproducibility
Zhengzheng Xu,Salim Balik,Kaley Woods,Zhilei Shen,Chihyao Cheng,Jing Cui,Haihong Gallogly,Eric Chang,Lauren Lukas,Andrew Lim,Yutaka Natsuaki,Jason Ye,Lijun Ma,Hualin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14410
2024-05-31
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to characterize the dosimetric properties of a commercial brass GRID collimator for high energy photon beams including 15 and 10 MV. Then, the difference in dosimetric parameters of GRID beams among different energies and linacs was evaluated. Method A water tank scanning system was used to acquire the dosimetric parameters, including the percentage depth dose (PDD), beam profiles, peak to valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and output factors (OFs). The profiles at various depths were measured at 100 cm source to surface distance (SSD), and field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2 and 20 × 20 cm2 on three linacs. The PVDRs and OFs were measured and compared with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. Results Compared with the open beam data, there were noticeable changes in PDDs of GRID fields across all the energies. The GRID fields demonstrated a maximal of 3 mm shift in dmax (Truebeam STX, 15MV, 10 × 10 cm2). The PVDR decreased as beam energy increases. The difference in PVDRs between Trilogy and Truebeam STx using 6MV and 15MV was 1.5% ± 4.0% and 2.1% ± 4.3%, respectively. However, two Truebeam linacs demonstrated less than 2% difference in PVDRs. The OF of the GRID field was dependent on the energy and field size. The measured PDDs, PVDRs, and OFs agreed with the TPS calculations within 3% difference. The TPS calculations agreed with the measurements when using 1 mm calculation resolution. Conclusion The dosimetric characteristics of high‐energy GRID fields, especially PVDR, significantly differ from those of low‐energy GRID fields. Two Truebeam machines are interchangeable for GRID therapy, while a pronounced difference was observed between Truebeam and Trilogy. A series of empirical equations and reference look‐up tables for GRID therapy can be generated to facilitate clinical applications.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging