Abstract:Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude and perception of post-graduate residents of neurosciences towards research ethics (RE) and research ethics committees (RECs). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted by the Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, targeting post-graduate neuroscience residents throughout Pakistan during January and February, 2024. An English-language general questionnaire, designed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of RE and RECs, was adapted to reflect local conditions. The collected responses were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to determine measures of central tendency, percentages, and frequencies. Results: Out of 241 residents, 64.3% were males. Sixty-eight percent respondents were from neurosurgery and 32% were from the field of neurology. Approximately 47% responses were from the province of Punjab. More than half (51.5%) of participants acknowledged the existence of a REC within their institution. A similar proportion (52.3%) claimed familiarity with ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects, only a slight majority (48.5%) demonstrated awareness of the specific functions carried out by RECs. Meanwhile, 44.5% expressed concerns that undergoing review by a REC could potentially delay research and pose additional challenges for researchers. Additionally, 27.4% of respondents admitted to considering the fabrication of data or results as acceptable. Conclusion: Our research uncovered a significant correlation between participants' perceptions of RE and RECs and their comprehension of ethical principles. These findings indicate that medical postgraduates with a deeper understanding or awareness of research ethics principles and RECs tend to hold more robust attitudes toward these aspects. List of Abbreviations: AAHRPP: Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program, DME: Department of Medical Education, DRAP-CSC: Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan-Clinical Studies Committee, FCPS: Fellow of College of Physicians and Surgeons, IRBs: Institutional Review Boards, LMICs: Low-Middle-Income Countries, MCQs: Multiple Choice Questions, MD: Master of Medicine, MS: Master of Surgery, NBC-REC: National Bioethics Committee-Research Ethics Committee, PMDC: Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, RE: Research Ethics, RECs: Research Ethics Committees, SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.12(PINS).11116 How to cite this: Qadri HM, Shahid R, Fatima SB, Naveed N, Khizar A, Siraj ul Haq, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Post-Graduate Residents of Neurosciences - A Nationwide Analysis from Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(12):S55-S62. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.12(PINS).11116 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India

Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region

Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool

Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!

A cross-sectional study: Need of equal respect for all professionals in the Institutional Ethics Committees' composition

Post-approval process: A challenge for ethics committees

A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda

Ethics in medical research: A quantitative analysis of the observations of Ethics Committees in research protocols.

The readiness of the Asian research ethics committees in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country survey

Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives

A Snapshot Summary and Comparative Analysis of Selected Ethics Review Committees Reviewing Clinical Trials in Sri Lanka

Prioritizing Initiatives for Institutional Review Board (IRB) Quality Improvement

Investigating Perceived Institutional Review Board Quality and Function Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool

Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: with special reference to Turkey

The UK research ethics committee: Making the case for better serving the underserved – can we do better?

A transformative solution to build effective, transparent, and resilient "fit-for-purpose" national health research ethics systems

Research involvement of medical students in a medical school of India: exploring knowledge, attitude, practices, and perceived barriers

Cross-border data sharing through the lens of research ethics committee members in sub-Saharan Africa

Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines

Is Institutional Review Board (IRB) Doing Its Job Right? How To Assess This.

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Post-Graduate Residents of Neurosciences - A Nationwide Analysis from Pakistan