Assessment of the impact of NO2 contribution on aerosol-optical-depth measurements at several sites worldwide

Masoom, Akriti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5525-2024

IF: 4.184

2024-09-19

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Abstract:This work aims at investigating the effect of NO 2 absorption on aerosol-optical-depth (AOD) measurements and Ångström exponent (AE) retrievals of sun photometers by the synergistic use of accurate NO 2 characterization for optical-depth estimation from co-located ground-based measurements. The analysis was performed for ∼ 7 years (2017–2023) at several sites worldwide for the AOD measurements and AE retrievals by Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sun photometers which use OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) climatology for NO 2 representation. The differences in AOD and AE retrievals by NO 2 absorption are accounted for using high-frequency columnar NO 2 measurements by a co-located Pandora spectroradiometer belonging to the Pandonia Global Network (PGN). NO 2 absorption affects the AOD measurements in UV-Vis (visible) range, and we found that the AOD bias is the most affected at 380 nm by NO 2 differences, followed by 440, 340, and 500 nm , respectively. AERONET AOD was found to be overestimated in half of the cases, while also underestimated in other cases as an impact of the NO 2 difference from "real" (PGN NO 2 ) values. Overestimations or underestimations are relatively low. About one-third of these stations showed a mean difference in NO 2 and AOD (at 380 and 440 nm ) above 0.5 × 10 −4 mol m −2 and 0.002, respectively, which can be considered a systematic contribution to the uncertainties in the AOD measurements that are reported to be of the order of 0.01. However, under extreme NO 2 loading scenarios (i.e. 10 % highest differences) at highly urbanized/industrialized locations, even higher AOD differences were observed that were at the limit of or higher than the reported 0.01 uncertainty in the AOD measurement. PGN NO 2 -based sensitivity analysis of AOD difference suggested that for PGN NO 2 varying between 2 × 10 −4 and 8 × 10 −4 mol m −2 , the median AOD differences were found to rise above 0.01 (even above 0.02) with the increase in NO 2 threshold (i.e. the lower limit from 2 × 10 −4 to 8 × 10 −4 mol m −2 ). The AOD-derivative product, AE, was also affected by the NO 2 correction (discrepancies between the AERONET OMI climatological representation of NO 2 values and the real PGN NO 2 measurements) on the spectral AOD. Normalized frequency distribution of AE (at 440–870 and 340–440 nm wavelength pair) was found to be narrower for a broader AOD distribution for some stations, and vice versa for other stations, and a higher relative error at the shorter wavelength (among the wavelength pairs used for AE estimation) led to a shift in the peak of the AE difference distribution towards a higher positive value, while a higher relative error at a lower wavelength shifted the AE difference distribution to a negative value for the AOD overestimation case, and vice versa for the AOD underestimation case. For rural locations, the mean NO 2 differences were found to be mostly below 0.50 × 10 −4 mol m −2 , with the corresponding AOD differences being below 0.002, and in extreme NO 2 loading scenarios, it went above this value and reached above 1.00 × 10 −4 mol m -Abstract Truncated-

meteorology & atmospheric sciences