Abstract:BACKGROUND:Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common types of intracranial haematoma, and often occurs in older people. Burr-hole craniostomy, which is an evacuation through one or two burr holes drilled over the site of the haematoma, has been widely accepted as the most effective way to manage CSDH. Recurrences are a major problem and need reoperation, sometimes repeatedly. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects and safety of the use of external drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. SEARCH METHODS:We ran our first search on 27 November 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), PubMed, ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S and CPSI-SSH), Chinese databases, and clinical trials registers, and screened reference lists. In compliance with the MECIR conduct standard 37, the Cochrane Injuries Group Information Specialist ran an update search within 12 months of publication (25 April 2016). We have screened these results but not incorporated the findings into the current review; as a result of the update search, one trial is awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared external subdural drains with no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Two review authors identified potential articles from the literature search, extracted data independently using a data extraction form and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For dichotomous data, where statistical heterogeneity was low, we calculated summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS:Nine RCTs, including a total of 968 participants, reported outcomes specified by this review. Only one RCT reported the use of an adequate method of allocation concealment; this trial was a large, single-centre, high quality study and was adequately reported. All included trials reported a reduced recurrence of CSDH with external subdural drains. We found a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence with subdural drains (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.61, I(2) = 38%; 9 studies, 968 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was no strong evidence of any increase in complications (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.72, I(2) = 0%; 7 studies, 710 participants; low-quality evidence), mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33, I(2) = 22%; 5 studies, 539 participants; low-quality evidence), or poor functional outcome (which included deaths) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.05, I(2) = 31%; 5 studies, 490 participants; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:There is some evidence that postoperative drainage is effective in reducing the symptomatic recurrence of CSDH. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Due to the low quality of the evidence for the secondary outcomes, the effect of drainage on the occurrence of surgical complications, mortality and poor functional outcome is uncertain. This uncertainty can be clarified with data from high-quality studies which may be conducted in the future. There is no strong evidence of any increase in complications when drains are used.

The drainage volume control by elevation of drainage height versus head down tilt in supine position for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery

A Comparison of Subperiosteal or Subgaleal Drainage with Subdural Drainage on the Outcomes of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

External drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults.

The Comparison Between Surgical Procedure and Conservative Treatment in the Management of Traumatic Subdural Effusion

Effectiveness of Continuous Lumbar Drainage for CSF Leakage: A Systematic Review

Causal analysis and management strategies of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following translabyrinthine approach for acoustic neuromas

Effect of the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis

Burr-hole Irrigation with Closed-system Drainage for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-analysis

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Risk factors and management strategies for cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery

Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Continuous lumbar cistern drainage for treatment of cerebrospinal lfuid leakage after neck tumor surgery

Value of lumbar subarachnoid drainage in refractory cerebrospinal fluid leakage following removal of spinal tumors

Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Spine Surgery

Subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage vs. subdural drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal operation

Clinical evaluation of performing subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid drainage in the treatment of pseudomeningoceles

Analysis of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage and Intracranial Pressure Peaks in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Valve-controlled chronic subdural hematoma drainage: A feasibility study

Continued lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in surgery for intracranial aneurysms

Intraoperative irrigation of artificial cerebrospinal fluid and temperature of irrigation fluid for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis