Abstract:This article examines the development of Japanese voluntary employer-sponsored retirement plans with an emphasis on recent trends. Until 2001, companies in Japan offered retirement benefits as lump-sum severance payments and/or benefits from one of two types of defined benefit (DB) pension plans. One type of DB plan was based on the occupational pension model used in the United States before the adoption of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but lacked the funding, vesting, and other protective features contained in ERISA. The other type of DB plan allowed companies to opt out of the earnings-related portion of social security, commonly referred to as "contracting out." Landmark laws passed in 2001 introduced a new generation of occupational retirement plans to employers and employees. One law increased funding requirements and enhanced employee protections for employer-sponsored DB plans, while a second law introduced defined contribution (DC) plans for several reasons, chiefly to increase retirement savings and help boost Japanese financial markets. These laws complemented earlier changes in the tax code and financial accounting standards already affecting employer-sponsored retirement plans. As a result, new retirement plan designs will replace most prereform era company retirement plans by 2012. In 2001, the experience of 401(k) plans in the United States, where 42 million participants had accumulated more than $1.8 trillion in assets over 20 years, attracted considerable attention among Japanese lawmakers finalizing provisions of the DC pension law. Even with government support and encouragement from the financial services industry, Japanese companies have not adopted these new DC plans in large numbers. As a result, occupational retirement plans in Japan have remained predominantly DB-a surprising development in light of the shift in a number of countries from DB to DC plans observed in recent decades. However, recent proposals to make DC plans more attractive to employers in Japan are likely to be implemented in the near future. This article summarizes the Japanese retirement system, with an emphasis on private-sector employees, and the complementary role played by voluntary employer-sponsored retirement plans; describes the financial pressures that faced retirement plan sponsors in the late twentieth century and the factors motivating the reform of Japanese voluntary retirement plans; examines the 2001 legislative changes that have transformed company retirement plans; and concludes with a review of trends and recent developments in employer-sponsored retirement plans since the implementation of the 2001 pension laws.

Do defined contribution plans create value for shareholders?

The ongoing growth of defined contribution and individual account plans: issues and implications

Should Defined Contribution Plans Include Private Equity Investments?

DC Pension Fund Best-practice Design and Governance

Defined Contribution Pension Risk and Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from United Kingdom

Corporate Social Responsibility, Pension Assumptions, and Risky Asset Allocations in Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The evolution of Japanese employer-sponsored retirement plans

Boon or bane: 401(k) loans and employee contributions

De-risking strategies of defined benefit plans and economic outcome: empirical evidence from U.S. Firms

Does Freezing a Defined-Benefit Pension Plan Increase Company Value? Empirical Evidence

Do Employee Share Owners Face Too Much Financial Risk?

Does Common Ownership Affect Employee Welfare? Evidence from Corporate Pension Funding

Nash Equilibrium Strategy for a DC Pension Plan with State-Dependent Risk Aversion: A Multiperiod Mean-Variance Framework

Does Equity Ownership Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings

Does CEO inside debt compensation benefit both shareholders and debtholders?

Risk and Portfolio Choices in Individual and Collective Pension Plans

The Market for Corporate Control and CEO Compensation: Complements or Substitutes?

Family CEOs: Do They Benefit Firm Performance in China?

Shareholder Coordination, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value

Ambiguity Aversion and the Puzzle of Own-Company Stock in Pension Plans ∗

Corporate Pension Systems and Pension Funding Status in ASEAN Countries