Abstract:Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Ahead of Print. Introduction:The treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is currently a challenge for vascular surgeons, because of the early morbidity and mortality rates and the high risk of late aortic events up to 50% at 5 years. This study presents the initial outcomes of ATBAD treatment using optimal medical therapy alone or combined with proximal entry tear stent-graft coverage. Additionally, it provides an analysis of the evolution of the aortic diameter and its clinical consequences during the chronic phase in each group.Materials and Methods:Conducted as a retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled all consecutive ATBAD patients (n=130) treated between 2008 and 2020. The primary analysis studies the entire patient cohort based on their initial management approach, namely, medical treatment alone for uncomplicated ATBAD (n=67) or combined with stent-graft entry tear coverage (n=63). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate factors associated with disease progression in the medical management group.Results:Median follow-up was 29.5 months. During this time aneurysmal evolution was observed in: 42.4% of cases in the medical group compared with 21.8% in the stent-graft group, primarily affecting the thoracic aorta. The stent-graft group exhibited significant aortic remodeling, with a decrease in false lumen (FL) and thoracic aortic diameters. Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and FL ≥22 mm were independent risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. Five-year survival was consistent at 76.1% in both groups.Conclusion:This study confirms the safety and efficacy of stent-graft entry tear coverage for ATBAD. Initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) appears to reduce late aortic events by promoting aortic remodeling. Considering TEVAR's safety and potential to prevent late aortic complications, it may be considered for uncomplicated ATBAD patients with an initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm or an FL ≥22 mm.Clinical ImpactThis study validates the efficacy and safety of using endovascular stent grafts to seal the proximal entry tear in cases of acute type B aortic dissections, compared to optimal medical therapy. Aortic remodelling significantly benefits from endovascular stent graft coverage of the proximal entry tear. Given the heightened risk of late aortic events observed in the medical therapy cohort, there appears to be a necessity for including endovascular interventions in the management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections, particularly when aortic diameter is ≥40 mm and false lumen diameter is ≥22 mm.

Choosing the correct treatment for acute aortic type B dissection

Emerging Trends in the Care of Type B Aortic Dissections

Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of type B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch

Update in the Management of Aortic Dissection

Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Document on Management of Type B Aortic Dissection

Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the best option?: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years

Endovascular repair versus best medical treatment for uncomplicated acute type B acute aorta dissection: a meta-analysis

Complicated acute type B aortic dissection: update on management and results

Endovascular Management of a Chronic Type A Aortic Dissection: Case Report

Update in the management of type B aortic dissection

Acute non-A non-B aortic dissection: incidence, treatment and outcome

Current knowledge and contemporary management of non-A non-B aortic dissections

Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Optimal Timing of Endovascular Treatment for Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus medical therapy for treatment of type B aortic dissection

Approach to the Treatment of Aortic Dissection

Treatment of serious complications following endovascular aortic repair for type B thoracic aortic dissection

Treatment and 4-Year Follow-Up of 163 Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections: A Single-Center Experience

Treatment of the mid-and long-term complications of endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection