Abstract:Objective Stanford type A acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening medical condition with high rates of morbidity and mortality that requires surgical repair, on an emergency basis. The extent of aortic arch repair that should be carried out during emergency surgery of this type is controversial. This study was conducted to report clinical experience on aortic arch repair and determine surgical indication, optimal operative procedures and strategy for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Methods 210 consecutive patients with acute Stanford A aortic dissection who underwent aortic arch replacement combined with implantation of stented elephant trunk into the descending aorta between August 2005 and August 2010. Surgical procedures included hemi-aortic arch replacement in 92 patients, subtotal aortic arch replacement in 50 patients and total aortic arch replacement in 68 patients. All operations were performed with the aid of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP). Enhanced computed tomography scanning was performed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, particularly the fate of the false lumen remaining in the descending thoracic aorta by aortic arch replacement combined with implantation of stented elephant trunk during follow up. Results Average cardiopulmonary bypass time was (146 ±52) min. The average cross clamp time was(93 ±25)min and average selective cerebral perfusion and circulatory arrest time was(35 ±14)min. The overall in-hospital mortality was 4. 8% (10/210) and morbidity was 8. 6% ( 18/210). Postoperative complications included acute renal failure, stroke, mediastinitis and respiratory insufficiency. During the follow-up period [mean (27 ± 18) months, ranged 2 to 60 months], 1 patient underwent reoperation due to the descending thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm. There was no late death. Follow-up enhanced CT scanning showed about 74% false lumens obliterated at the level of the distal border of the stent graft post operation. Conclusion Open aortic arch replacement is an effective approach and provides acceptable outcomes for type A acute aortic dissection. Optimal treatment strategy is the key factor to success in emergency surgical intervention.

Approach to the Treatment of Aortic Dissection

Endoluminal and Surgical Treatment for the Management of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

Deployment of Endograft in the Ascending Aorta to Reverse Type A Aortic Dissection.

Acute Ischemic Stroke Combined with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report and Literature Review

Choosing the correct treatment for acute aortic type B dissection

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Dissection, Penetrating Aortic Ulcer, and Intramural Hematoma

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection

Update in the Management of Aortic Dissection

Acute non-A non-B aortic dissection: incidence, treatment and outcome

Current knowledge and contemporary management of non-A non-B aortic dissections

Aortic dissections and dissecting aneurysms

Non-A non-B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

A One-Fits-All Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

Update in the management of type B aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection – a review

Management of Acute Dissecting Aneurysms of the Aorta

Treatment Strategy of Aortic Arch for Type A Acute Dissection

Emergency Treatment of Aortic Dissection and Clinical Pathway Discussion

Management of Complete Aortic Dissection in a 65-Year-Old Male: A Case Report