Abstract:Humans often cooperate with strangers, despite the costs involved. A long tradition of theoretical modeling has sought ultimate evolutionary explanations for this seemingly altruistic behavior. More recently, an entirely separate body of experimental work has begun to investigate cooperation's proximate cognitive underpinnings using a dual-process framework: Is deliberative self-control necessary to reign in selfish impulses, or does self-interested deliberation restrain an intuitive desire to cooperate? Integrating these ultimate and proximate approaches, we introduce dual-process cognition into a formal game-theoretic model of the evolution of cooperation. Agents play prisoner's dilemma games, some of which are one-shot and others of which involve reciprocity. They can either respond by using a generalized intuition, which is not sensitive to whether the game is one-shot or reciprocal, or pay a (stochastically varying) cost to deliberate and tailor their strategy to the type of game they are facing. We find that, depending on the level of reciprocity and assortment, selection favors one of two strategies: intuitive defectors who never deliberate, or dual-process agents who intuitively cooperate but sometimes use deliberation to defect in one-shot games. Critically, selection never favors agents who use deliberation to override selfish impulses: Deliberation only serves to undermine cooperation with strangers. Thus, by introducing a formal theoretical framework for exploring cooperation through a dual-process lens, we provide a clear answer regarding the role of deliberation in cooperation based on evolutionary modeling, help to organize a growing body of sometimes-conflicting empirical results, and shed light on the nature of human cognition and social decision making.

Cooperate without looking: why we care what people think and not just what they do

Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

The collapse of cooperation in evolving games

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Costly hide and seek pays: Unexpected consequences of deceit in a social dilemma

Translucent Players: Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Social Dilemmas

Cooperation without punishment

Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games

Game Theory and the Evolution of Cooperation

Onymity Promotes Cooperation in Social Dilemma Experiments

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

A preference to learn from successful rather than common behaviours in human social dilemmas

The Evolution Of Cooperation In The Presence Of Costs Of Information Transfer

Cooperation and Control in Multiplayer Social Dilemmas

The evolution of cooperation

A solution concept for games with altruism and cooperation

Competition and partnership between conformity and payoff-based imitations in social dilemmas

Predicting Human Cooperation

Unravelling the many facets of human cooperation in an experimental study

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation