Abstract:Objective(s): Assisted reproductive technology (ART) Centers and laboratories perform complex tasks with patients and their gametes/embryos daily. The degree of problems/non-conformances in such surroundings must be minimized at zero point. This study aimed to establish the proper risk management system with well-defined process steps to prevent and eliminate problems/non-conformances. Study design: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) was introduced in the ART Center and the IVF laboratory. ART Center working processes were grouped into the categories of Clinical procedures, Forms, Identification, Personnel, Patients, and Facility. Working processes in the IVF laboratory were grouped into the categories of Consumables, Media, Equipment, Personnel, Working space, and Procedures. The traceability and safety of the working processes were evaluated before and after corrective measures regarding risk priority number (RPN). The severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) index of problems/non-conformance were scaled from 1 to 5. The RPN was calculated by multiplying the SOD index, and the cut-off value for RPN was ≥12. Results: The increased RPN was found in the following working processes of the ART Center: Embryo transfer and pregnancy (RPN = 18) in the category of Clinical procedures; Informed consents and agreements (RPN = 16) in the category Forms; Continuous education of the knowledge and skills (RPN = 12) in Personnel category; Space conditions (RPN = 24) and Equipment (RPN = 12) in the category Facility. In the IVF laboratory, increased RPN was found in the following working processes: Production of the plasticware (RPN = 12), Transport (RPN = 12) and Storage (RPN = 12) in the category Consumables; Media production (RPN = 16) in category Media; Alarm notification system for the critical equipment (RPN = 12) in category Equipment; Personnel number and qualifications (RPN = 12), Standard operative procedures (SOP) (RPN = 12) and Continuous education of the knowledge and skills (RPN = 12) in category Personnel; Working conditions (RPN = 18) and Security (RPN = 20) in Working space; Patient identification (RPN = 20), Biological samples identification (RPN = 20), Records (RPN = 12), ART procedure (RPN = 30), Embryo transfer (RPN = 30) and Cryopreservation and thawing of biological samples (RPN = 30) in category Procedures. According to the RPN score, corrective measures were implemented. Most RPN scores were reduced after the implementation of the electronic witnessing system in patient/sample tracing steps. Phases Patient identification and Biological sample identification showed a double reduction of RPN scores, from 20 to 10. Also, for critical steps in ART procedures, Embryo transfer, Cryopreservation, and thawing of biological samples, the RPN score was reduced from 30 to 10. Proper education of personnel was another corrective measure that significantly contributed to a reduction of RPN scores in most of the categories. Conclusion(s): The FMEA analysis is useful in recognizing the critical steps of an ART Center. The RPN scores for patient traceability were successfully reduced using the electronic witnessing system. Nonetheless, the study has certain limitations, as FMEA is highly dependent on the specific healthcare organization, adherence to national guidelines, and the subjective nature of SOD and RPN evaluations.

Systematics in the interaction of metal ions with the main-chain carbonyl group in protein structures.

FMECA Application to Intraoperative Electron Beam Radiotherapy Procedure As a Quality Method to Prevent and Reduce Patient's Risk in Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer

Practical implementation of failure mode and effects analysis for safety and efficiency in stereotactic radiosurgery

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Application in External Beam Radiotherapy

Clinical implementation of failure modes and effects analysis for gynecological high-dose-rate brachytherapy

The WISC-III Freedom from Distractibility Factor: Its Utility in Identifying Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Evaluation and improvement the safety of total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy using repeat failure mode and effects analysis

Process failure mode and effects analysis for external beam radiotherapy: Introducing a literature-based template and a novel action priority

Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR‐Linac system

How can the failure mode and effect analysis improve the working processes in the ART center?

Multi‐phase failure modes and effects analysis for low dose bilateral whole lung irradiation of COVID‐19 positive patients requiring respiratory ventilation

Evaluation of failure modes and effect analysis for routine risk assessment of lung radiotherapy at a UK center

Clinical effects of re-evaluating a lung SBRT failure mode and effects analysis in a radiotherapy department

Healthcare failure mode and effect analysis in the chemotherapy preparation process

On the need of in vivo verifications as quality control for intraoperative electron radiotherapy in breast cancer

Implementing failure mode and effect analysis to improve the safety of volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation.

FMECA Application in Tomotherapy: Comparison between Classic and Fuzzy Methodologies

Notes on the definition and nomenclature of tandemly repetitive DNA sequences.

Application of failure mode and effects analysis to validate a novel hybrid Linac QC program that integrates automated and conventional QC testing

[Effect of preoperative irradiation on histological tumor propagation and on the frequency of vaginal recurrence of uterine cancer].

Which failures do patient‐specific quality assurance systems need to catch?