Abstract:Background: An effective emergency triage system is lacking in mainland China. The Chinese Emergency Triage Scale (CETS) was developed based on vital complaints and vital parameters, according to Chinese data. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the CETS by emergency department (ED) nurses in eight EDs in mainland China. Design: A cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted. Settings: Eight EDs in the eastern, western, northern, and central areas of mainland China. Participants: A total of 51 ED nurses and 8000 active ED patients participated in the study between May and September 2018 in eight EDs. Methods: Standardized triage scenarios and active patients were assigned to nurses who used the CETS for evaluative purposes. Accuracy was defined by concordance with the key for the scenarios and was calculated as percentages. Inter-rater reliability was measured by weighted kappa to compare the triage nurse's rating with the research nurse's acuity level for each patient. The triage time and clinical outcome of 1000 active patients per site also were collected. The criterion-related validity of the CETS was evaluated; criteria included ED mortality, number of patients discharged, and admission to ICU or general ward. The relationship between the CETS acuity levels triaged by the research nurse and four possible outcomes was assessed with a cross-classification table, using a chi-square test. The ability of the CETS to predict ED mortality was assessed via the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results: Mean pooled accuracy from all sites was 89.4% (95% CI = 86.9%-91.8%), and the proportion of over-triage slightly exceeded under-triage (6.5% vs. 4.1%). There was no difference in accuracy between sites or according to nurse experience. Inter-rater reliability values for triage nurses and research nurses were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.95-0.97), based on the quadratic weight kappa. Trauma cases were assigned to triage with greater accuracy than were nontrauma cases, both for the scenarios and for active patients. The average triage time of ED nurses in all sites was 151.5 +/- 26.3 s, using the computer-based triage instrument. The chi-square test showed that there was a significant difference in triage time between the CETS levels (p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.968 (95% CI = 0.958-0.979). Conclusions: The CETS is a reliable system for ED triage and can promote rapid and effective triage in mainland China. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.orgilicenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Reliability and Validity of the Four-Level Chinese Emergency Triage Scale in Mainland China: A Multicenter Assessment

Adaptation and evaluation of the Chinese hospital nursing department disaster preparedness scale: a cross-sectional scale development study

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of the Perceived Competence Scale for Disaster Mental Health Workforce: A Cross-Sectional Study

Disaster Preparedness Among Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

The model for assessing disaster literacy in nurses: Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study

Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version Questionnaire for Measuring Emergency Nursing Interruptions

Development and preliminary validation of a public health emergency competency model for medical staffs of national health emergency teams in China

Assessment of disaster preparedness and related impact factors among emergency nurses in tertiary hospitals: descriptive cross-sectional study from Henan Province of China

Validation of a Chinese version of the Analysing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience Scale in nurses in China

Development and initial validation of the career resilience instrument for CDC emergency responders in China within the context of public health emergencies: based on a survey conducted in Shanghai

Disaster Preparedness and Associated Factors Among Emergency Nurses in Guangdong Province, China: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Development and psychometric testing of the nurses' core competencies for public health emergencies scale: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

The Validity and IRT Psychometric Analysis of Chinese Version of Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10)

Development and Validation of the Coping Capacity Measurement Scale of Public Health Emergencies in China

[Development and Testing of a Preparedness and Response Capacity Questionnaire in Public Health Emergency for Chinese Provincial and Municipal Governments].

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire among medical staff in Taiwan