Abstract:Importance: Residents must prepare for effective communication with patients after medical errors. The video-based communication assessment (VCA) is software that plays video of a patient scenario, asks the physician to record what they would say, engages crowdsourced laypeople to rate audio recordings of physician responses, and presents feedback to physicians. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of VCA feedback in resident error disclosure skill training. Design, setting, and participants: This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2022 to May 2023 at 7 US internal medicine and family medicine residencies (10 total sites). Participants were second-year residents attending required teaching conferences. Data analysis was performed from July to December 2023. Intervention: Residents completed 2 VCA cases at time 1 and were randomized to the intervention, an individual feedback report provided in the VCA application after 2 weeks, or to control, in which feedback was not provided until after time 2. Residents completed 2 additional VCA cases after 4 weeks (time 2). Main outcomes and measures: Panels of crowdsourced laypeople rated recordings of residents disclosing simulated medical errors to create scores on a 5-point scale. Reports included learning points derived from layperson comments. Mean time 2 ratings were compared to test the hypothesis that residents who had access to feedback on their time 1 performance would score higher at time 2 than those without feedback access. Residents were surveyed about demographic characteristics, disclosure experience, and feedback use. The intervention's effect was examined using analysis of covariance. Results: A total of 146 residents (87 [60.0%] aged 25-29 years; 60 female [41.0%]) completed the time 1 VCA, and 103 (70.5%) completed the time 2 VCA (53 randomized to intervention and 50 randomized to control); of those, 28 (54.9%) reported reviewing their feedback. Analysis of covariance found a significant main effect of feedback between intervention and control groups at time 2 (mean [SD] score, 3.26 [0.45] vs 3.14 [0.39]; difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.48; P = .01). In post hoc comparisons restricted to residents without prior disclosure experience, intervention residents scored higher than those in the control group at time 2 (mean [SD] score, 3.33 [0.43] vs 3.09 [0.44]; difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.01-0.48; P = .007). Worse performance at time 1 was associated with increased likelihood of dropping out before time 2 (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.06-7.84; P = .04). Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, self-directed review of crowdsourced feedback was associated with higher ratings of internal medicine and family medicine residents' error disclosure skill, particularly for those without real-life error disclosure experience, suggesting that such feedback may be an effective way for residency programs to address their requirement to prepare trainees for communicating with patients after medical harm. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06234085.

Effects of electronic health record use on the exam room communication skills of resident physicians: a randomized within-subjects study

Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.

The Electronic Health Record Objective Structured Clinical Examination Station: Assessing Student Competency in Patient Notes and Patient Interaction

Impact of Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Training for Residents Preparing for Practice in Patient-Centered Medical Homes

Improving Patient–Provider Communication and Therapeutic Practice Through Better Integration of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room: A Pilot Study

Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit

Electronic health records and clinical documentation in medical residency programs: preparing residents to become master clinicians

Dynamic Comparison of Physicians’ Interaction Style with Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Settings

Electronic health records: its effects on the doctor-patient relationship and the role of the computer in the clinical setting

Concordance Between Electronic Clinical Documentation and Physicians' Observed Behavior

Training physicians and residents for the use of Electronic Health Records-A comparative case study between two hospitals

Assessment of the impact on time to complete medical record using an electronic medical record versus a paper record on emergency department patients: a study

Impact of response bias in three surveys on primary care providers' experiences with electronic health records

Relationship of resident characteristics, attitudes, prior training and clinical knowledge to communication skills performance

Strategizing EHR use to achieve patient-centered care in exam rooms: a qualitative study on primary care providers

An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse–patient interactions and communication

Crowdsourced Feedback to Improve Resident Physician Error Disclosure Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record

Assessing the quality of electronic medical records as a platform for resident education

Academic electronic health records as a vehicle to augment the assessment of patient care skills in the didactic pharmacy curriculum

Effect of a Peer Comparison and Educational Intervention on Medical Test Conversation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial