Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can pass explicit social bias tests but still harbor implicit biases, similar to humans who endorse egalitarian beliefs yet exhibit subtle biases. Measuring such implicit biases can be a challenge: as LLMs become increasingly proprietary, it may not be possible to access their embeddings and apply existing bias measures; furthermore, implicit biases are primarily a concern if they affect the actual decisions that these systems make. We address both challenges by introducing two new measures of bias: LLM Implicit Bias, a prompt-based method for revealing implicit bias; and LLM Decision Bias, a strategy to detect subtle discrimination in decision-making tasks. Both measures are based on psychological research: LLM Implicit Bias adapts the Implicit Association Test, widely used to study the automatic associations between concepts held in human minds; and LLM Decision Bias operationalizes psychological results indicating that relative evaluations between two candidates, not absolute evaluations assessing each independently, are more diagnostic of implicit biases. Using these measures, we found pervasive stereotype biases mirroring those in society in 8 value-aligned models across 4 social categories (race, gender, religion, health) in 21 stereotypes (such as race and criminality, race and weapons, gender and science, age and negativity). Our prompt-based LLM Implicit Bias measure correlates with existing language model embedding-based bias methods, but better predicts downstream behaviors measured by LLM Decision Bias. These new prompt-based measures draw from psychology's long history of research into measuring stereotype biases based on purely observable behavior; they expose nuanced biases in proprietary value-aligned LLMs that appear unbiased according to standard benchmarks.

Explicit vs. Implicit: Investigating Social Bias in Large Language Models through Self-Reflection

Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models

Mind vs. Mouth: On Measuring Re-judge Inconsistency of Social Bias in Large Language Models

Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs

Promoting Equality in Large Language Models: Identifying and Mitigating the Implicit Bias based on Bayesian Theory

Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspective

Evaluating and Mitigating Social Bias for Large Language Models in Open-ended Settings

Covert Bias: The Severity of Social Views' Unalignment in Language Models Towards Implicit and Explicit Opinion

Ask LLMs Directly, "What shapes your bias?": Measuring Social Bias in Large Language Models

"Im not Racist but...": Discovering Bias in the Internal Knowledge of Large Language Models

Exploring Subjectivity for more Human-Centric Assessment of Social Biases in Large Language Models

Uncovering Biases with Reflective Large Language Models

FairMonitor: A Dual-framework for Detecting Stereotypes and Biases in Large Language Models

Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs

Interpreting Bias in Large Language Models: A Feature-Based Approach

A Study of Implicit Ranking Unfairness in Large Language Models

Subtle Biases Need Subtler Measures: Dual Metrics for Evaluating Representative and Affinity Bias in Large Language Models

White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs

The African Woman is Rhythmic and Soulful: An Investigation of Implicit Biases in LLM Open-ended Text Generation

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey