Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) presents a formidable challenge in artificial intelligence, demanding intricate comprehension of legal texts, nuanced interpretation of statutes, and complex reasoning over multifaceted case elements. While recent advancements in natural language processing have shown promise, existing approaches often struggle to capture the sophisticated interplay between facts, legal principles, and precedents that characterize legal decision-making. This paper introduces LegalReasoner, a novel multi-stage framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and integrates domain-specific knowledge for enhanced legal judgment prediction. Our approach encompasses four key stages: 1) legal knowledge infusion, where we pre-train an LLM on a vast corpus of legal literature using contrastive learning techniques; 2) case-law retrieval, employing a graph neural network to identify relevant precedents and statutes; 3) multi-hop reasoning, utilizing a transformer-based architecture with a hierarchical attention mechanism to navigate complex legal arguments; and 4) judgment synthesis, where we employ a generative adversarial network to produce coherent and legally sound judgments. We evaluate LegalReasoner on two diverse datasets: the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) cases and the Chinese AI and Law Challenge (CAIL2018). Our framework demonstrates substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average accuracy increase of 7.8% across all datasets. Furthermore, we conduct extensive ablation studies and interpretability analyses to elucidate the contributions of each component and provide insights into the model's decision-making process. Our work not only advances the field of automated legal reasoning but also offers a transparent and explainable system that could serve as a valuable tool for legal professionals. By bridging the gap between AI and legal expertise, LegalReasoner paves the way for more efficient, consistent, and fair legal decision-making processes.

Automating Legal Concept Interpretation with LLMs: Retrieval, Generation, and Evaluation

Exploiting LLMs' Reasoning Capability to Infer Implicit Concepts in Legal Information Retrieval

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models

Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval

Explaining Legal Concepts with Augmented Large Language Models (GPT-4)

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction

Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement

From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge

Intention and Context Elicitation with Large Language Models in the Legal Aid Intake Process

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System

Know where to go: Make LLM a relevant, responsible, and trustworthy searchers

Large language models for automated Q&A involving legal documents: a survey on algorithms, frameworks and applications

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration

Methods for Legal Citation Prediction in the Age of LLMs: An Australian Law Case Study

Athena: Retrieval-augmented Legal Judgment Prediction with Large Language Models

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wisely

Large Language Models in Law: A Survey

From human experts to machines: An LLM supported approach to ontology and knowledge graph construction