Abstract:In a P300-based concealed information test (CIT), an increased response to a crime-related "probe" item of interest suggests concealed knowledge. Because the CIT's detection ability is based on knowledgeable parties recognizing the key item, weakening the crime memory might decrease probe identifiability and reduce diagnostic power. Research on retroactive memory interference (RI) has shown that acquiring new information after encoding a memory can degrade the original memory, which suggests that RI might pose a threat to CITs. To test this, Gronau et al. (2015) had participants complete a mock-crime, followed by either a control task or a RI manipulation task, intended to impair the crime memory. Both the simple guilty control and RI groups were subdivided into three time delay conditions: 1/3 of participants immediately completed the task and CIT, another 1/3 completed the task and returned a week later for the CIT, and the remaining participants completed both the task and CIT a week later. Results showed that RI reduced memory of crime details and skin conductance responses, while respiration line length was unaffected. Here, we extend Gronau et al. (2015), using the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the P300-based CIT, to investigate the influence of RI on recognition. The CIT effect was obvious in all six group × time delay subconditions, as evidenced by their significantly larger probe vs. irrelevant amplitudes, high percentage of bootstrapped iterations where probe > irrelevants, bootstrapped mean amplitude differences, and satisfactory hit rates. However, these indices of the CIT effect did not differ based on group or time delay, as was the case for target response error rates and P300 latencies. The only outcome of interest to vary by group or time delay was behavioral response times: both probe and combined irrelevant responses were delayed in the control (simple guilty) group. Thus, the evidence suggests that the RI manipulation used here does not threaten the P300-based CTP's accuracy. Results are considered as they compare to previous work, and limitations and possible explanations for our results are discussed.

Cognitive interview conducted in‐person and over‐the‐phone for informants' memory of overheard conversations

Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews

Interviewing witnesses and victims

Testing the efficacy of the cognitive interview to road traffic accident investigations

The efficacy of the Self‐Administered Interview: A systematic review

The Prevalence and Nature of Cognitive Interviewing as a Survey Questionnaire Evaluation Method in the United States

The effect of pre‐interview knowledge and instructions on interviewer memory

The efficacy of the Self‐Administered Interview in minimising the misinformation effect

The roles of interviewing conditions and individual differences in memory and suggestibility: An online interview study

Eyewitness confidence in the interviewing context: Understanding the impact of question type and order

The Practice of Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing

‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’ Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews

From interrogation to investigative interviewing; strategic trends in police questioning

It's a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test

Interview Versus Performance Assessment of Cognition as Predictors of Real-World Outcomes in a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Schizophrenia

Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.

Implementation of the aIAT for Forensic Purposes: A Narrative-Methodological Review

The resister, the talker and the confessor: A closer look at suspect responses in investigative interviews

The dynamic nature of interrogation.

The effect of retroactive memory interference on the P300-based Complex Trial Protocol (CTP)

Is the CIT susceptible to misleading information? A constructive replication